|Table of Contents|

Strength evaluation of levitation frame for medium and low speed maglev train based on full-scale bench test(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2023年06期
Page:
206-215
Research Field:
载运工具运用工程
Publishing date:
2023-12-30

Info

Title:
Strength evaluation of levitation frame for medium and low speed maglev train based on full-scale bench test
Author(s):
LI Miao1;  MA Ya-qun1;  WANG Yu2;  LUO Shi-hui1;  MA Wei-hua1;  LEI Cheng3
(1. State Key Laboratory of Rail Transit Vehicle System, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China; 2. CRRC Changchun Railway Vehicles Co., Ltd., Changchun 130062, Jilin, China; 3. Henan Engineering Research Center of Rail Transit Intelligent Security, Zhengzhou Railway Vocational and Technical College, Zhengzhou 451460, Henan, China)
Keywords:
vehicle engineering;  medium and low speed maglev;  field test;  levitation frame;  bench test;  strength evaluation
PACS:
U237
DOI:
10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.06.013
Abstract:
In order to evaluate whether the levitation frame of a medium and low speed maglev train meets the requirements of strength, the static strength and fatigue strength tests of the levitation frame were conducted by using the self-developed full-scale medium and low speed maglev strength test bench. According to the finite element analysis and the results obtained from multi-body dynamics simulation, the stress concentration position and bearing characteristics shown by the levitation frame were determined, followed by the reasonable arrangement of measuring points in a series on the levitation frame. The signals of strain response shown by the levitation frame of the train under three types of working conditions were measured, including extraordinary load, simulated main operation load, and simulated special operation load. Based on the material properties displayed by different parts of the levitation frame, the stress level of the levitation frame was evaluated through transformation calculation. Research results show that in the static strength test, large stress points of the levitation frame are mainly distribute at the corner of the bracket, the connection point between the mounting seat of support wheels and the anti-rolling beam, and the mounting seat of the parking brake sled, while the weak point obtained from the fatigue strength test is mainly at the weld joint between the longitudinal beam and the bracket. In comparison with the conventional operating conditions of the train, the stress amplitude values of the static strength and fatigue strength of the levitation frame increase by 1.06 and 4.77 times respectively under special operation conditions such as levitation failure and overloading braking. The maximum tensile stress and compressive stress of the levitation frame under all test conditions are 67.22 and -20.30 MPa, respectively, with the minimum safety factor as 1.71, indicating that the levitation frame meets the structural strength requirements. All the test data are within the envelope of the Goodman-Smith fatigue limit diagram of the corresponding material, indicating that the levitation frame meets the fatigue strength requirements. Through penetration inspection, it is identified that no cracks are found at any position of the levitation frame, which verifies the reliability of fatigue strength evaluation results of the levitation frame.4 tabs, 9 figs, 31 refs.

References:

[1] 翟婉明,赵春发.现代轨道交通工程科技前沿与挑战[J].西南交通大学学报,2016,51(2):209-226.
ZHAI Wan-ming, ZHAO Chun-fa. Frontiers and challenges of sciences and technologies in modern railway engineering[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 51(2): 209-226.(in Chinese)
[2] 徐 飞,罗世辉,邓自刚.磁悬浮轨道交通关键技术及全速度域应用研究[J].铁道学报,2019,41(3):40-49.
XU Fei, LUO Shi-hui, DENG Zi-gang. Study on key technologies and whole speed range application of maglev rail transport[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2019, 41(3): 40-49.(in Chinese)
[3] ZHANG Min, LUO Shi-hui, GAO Chang, et al. Research on the mechanism of a newly developed levitation frame with mid-set air spring[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2018, 56(12): 1797-1816.
[4] 蔡文锋, 颜 华,杨 平.中低速磁浮轨道系统特点及工程适应性分析[J].铁道工程学报,2015,32(2):54-59.
CAI Wen-feng, YAN Hua, YANG Ping. Analysis of the characteristics and engineering adaptability of track system for medium and low speed maglev transit[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2015, 32(2): 54-59.(in Chinese)
[5] 马卫华, 罗世辉, 张 敏,等.中低速磁浮车辆研究综述[J].交通运输工程学报,2021,21(1):199-216.
MA Wei-hua, LUO Shi-hui, ZHANG Min, et al. Research review on medium and low speed maglev vehicle[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(1): 199-216.(in Chinese)
[6] 胡齐斌.新型中低速磁浮列车悬浮架强度试验方法研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2020.
HU Qi-bin. Research on the strength test method of the levitation bogie for new-type mid-low speed maglev vehicle[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020.(in Chinese)
[7] 杨 磊.中低速磁浮列车转向架特性分析及计算[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学,2003.
YANG Lei. Analysis and calculation of bogie characteristics of medium and low speed maglev vehicle[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2003.(in Chinese)
[8] 周 益,刘 放,李 飞,等.运用SolidWorks和ANSYS的磁浮列车悬浮架结构有限元分析[J].现代制造工程,2012(8):17-20.
ZHOU Yi, LIU Fang, LI Fei, et al. Finite element analysis of the levitation chassis of maglev vehicle based on SolidWorks and ANSYS[J]. Modern Manufacturing Engineering, 2012(8): 17-20.(in Chinese)
[9] LEE H W, KIM K C, LEE J. Review of maglev train technologies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2006, 42(7): 1917-1925.
[10] ZHOU Dan-feng, HANSEN C H, LI Jie, et al. Review of coupled vibration problems in EMS maglev vehicles[J]. International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, 2010, 15(1): 10-23.
[11] XIU Rui-xian, SPIRYAGIN M, WU Qing, et al. Fatigue life assessment methods for railway vehicle bogie frames[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 116: 104725.
[12] KASSNER M. Fatigue strength analysis of a welded railway vehicle structure by different methods[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2012, 34(1): 103-111.
[13] ODA Y, YAGI T, OKINO T, et al. Fatigue life estimation for welds of truck frames for rolling stock using stress frequency in service load[J]. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2007, 73(10): 1171-1176.
[14] GRASSO M, XU Y, RUSSO R, et al. Mixed mode fatigue crack propagation behaviour of aluminium F357 alloy[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2018(90): 463-475.
[15] SARUNAC R. “Low Speed” magnetic levitation vehicle in the US[C]∥IEEE. Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference. New York: IEEE, 1999: 130-143.
[16] HAN S W, WOO K J. Evaluation of dynamic fatigue life for maglev bogie frame[J]. Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 2010, 13(1): 1-8.
[17] KIM J S. Fatigue assessment of tilting bogie frame for Korean tilting train: analysis and static tests[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2006, 13(8): 1326-1337.
[18] HAN J W, KIM J D, SONG S Y. Fatigue strength evaluation of a bogie frame for urban maglev train with fatigue test on full-scale test rig[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2013, 31: 412-420.
[19] 吴开洪,崔建昆.磁悬浮列车转向架的变形状态分析[J].现代机械,2017(1):34-36.
WU Kai-hong, CUI Jian-kun. The deformation state analysis of the bogie on a maglev train[J]. Modern Machinery, 2017(1): 34-36.(in Chinese)
[20] 罗圩琪,许 平,谢卓君.磁浮列车走行机构结构优化研究[J].城市轨道交通研究,2011,14(11):86-89,92.
LUO Yu-qi, XU Ping, XIE Zhuo-jun. Research on structure optimization of running gear of maglev train[J]. Urban Mass Transit, 2011, 14(11): 86-89, 92.(in Chinese)
[21] 姚生军,汤劲松,李东锋.中低速磁浮列车动载荷及动应力测试研究[J].铁道车辆,2013,51(5):1-4.
YAO Sheng-jun, TANG Jin-song, LI Dong-feng. Research on dynamic load and stress measurement for maglev trains with middle and low speed[J]. Rolling Stock, 2013, 51(5): 1-4.(in Chinese)
[22] 宗凌潇.时速140 km新型中低速磁浮列车走行机构研究分析[D].成都:西南交通大学,2016.
ZONG Ling-xiao. A research to running mechanism of new medium-low speed maglev train with its speed being 140 km·h-1[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016.(in Chinese)
[23] 吴元科,刘 放,张 斌,等.长定子中低速磁浮列车悬浮架疲劳寿命分析[J].现代制造工程,2016(8):54-59, 94.
WU Yuan-ke, LIU Fang, ZHANG Bin, et al. Fatigue life analysis of levitation chassis of long stator maglev vehicle[J]. Modern Manufacturing Engineering, 2016(8): 54-59, 94.(in Chinese)
[24] 彭奇彪,罗华军,佟来生,等.中低速磁浮车辆悬浮架的技术特征[J].电力机车与城轨车辆,2012,35(6):7-11.
PENG Qi-biao, LUO Hua-jun, TONG Lai-sheng, et al. Characteristics of maglev bogie for mid-low speed maglev vehicle[J]. Electric Locomotives and Mass Transit Vehicles, 2012, 35(6): 7-11.(in Chinese)
[25] 迟振华.长定子中低速磁浮列车悬浮架疲劳强度研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2014.
CHI Zhen-hua. Research on fatigue strength for levitation chassis of long stator middle-low speed maglev vehicle[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014.(in Chinese)
[26] 李 岑,姚毓瑾,虞大联,等.基于动力学仿真分析的磁悬浮列车悬浮架载荷特征研究[J].北京交通大学学报,2021,45(3):118-125.
LI Cen, YAO Yu-jin, YU Da-lian, et al. Study on load characteristics of maglev train suspension frame based on dynamics simulation analysis[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2021, 45(3): 118-125.(in Chinese)
[27] 赵 军.中低速磁浮列车车体轻量化设计[D].成都:西南交通大学,2017.
ZHAO Jun. Light weight design of medium-low speed maglev train carbody[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017.(in Chinese)
[28] 李 苗,马卫华,龚俊虎,等.中低速磁浮车辆-桥梁耦合系统动力性能试验[J].交通运输工程学报,2022,22(1):141-154.
LI Miao, MA Wei-hua, GONG Jun-hu, et al. Dynamic performance test of medium and low speed maglev vehicle-bridge coupled system[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(1): 141-154.(in Chinese)
[29] 魏德豪,罗世辉,王 晨.牵引杆对中低速磁浮动力学性能影响分析[J].机械设计与制造,2018(12):92-95.
WEI De-hao, LUO Shi-hui, WANG Chen. Analysis on the influences of traction rod to medium-low speed maglev dynamic performance[J]. Machinery Design and Manufacture, 2018(12): 92-95.(in Chinese)
[30] 任治军.中低速磁浮列车转向架疲劳寿命分析和仿真[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学,2005.
REN Zhi-jun. Fatigue analysis and simulation of maglev bogie in low and medium speed maglev train[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2005.(in Chinese)
[31] 沈彩瑜.铁道车辆转向架构架疲劳强度研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2014.
SHEN Cai-yu. Fatigue strength analysis of the welded bogie frame for railway vehicle[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014.(in Chinese)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-12-30