|Table of Contents|

Fast intelligent decision of operation schemes for construction of intelligent crude oil pipelines(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2023年05期
Page:
210-222
Research Field:
交通运输规划与管理
Publishing date:
2023-11-10

Info

Title:
Fast intelligent decision of operation schemes for construction of intelligent crude oil pipelines
Author(s):
WANG Jun-fang1;  CAO Dan-fu1;  JIAO Jie1;  YU Hong-mei1;  YUAN Qing2;  YU Bo3;  CHEN Zhi-min4;  DENG Ya-jun3
(1. PipeChina Network Corporation Eastern Oil Storage and Transportation Co., Ltd., Xuzhou 221008, Jiangsu, China; 2. School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, Shaanxi, China; 3. School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing 102617, China; 4. School of Energy and Power Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, Jilin, China)
Keywords:
pipeline transportation;  intelligent crude oil pipeline;  intelligent decision;  real-time optimization;  differential evolution algorithm;  parallel computing
PACS:
U171
DOI:
10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2023.05.014
Abstract:
To solve the real-time optimization problem during the construction of intelligent crude oil pipelines, an intelligent decision model of operation schemes with the optimization goals of minimizing the energy consumption and unsafe factor was established from the perspectives of energy saving and operational safety. Based on the differential evolution algorithm, the ideas of improving the reliability and optimization efficiency of the optimization algorithm were proposed from the perspectives of algorithms, including from the processing of mutation decision variables beyond bounds and the mutation operator of discrete decision variables. Combined with the algorithm computation process and parallel computing framework, four parallel computing strategies were proposed. The Yizheng-Changling Crude Oil Pipeline(Yichang Pipeline)with a length of about 900 km was used as the tested pipeline to verify and further analyze the algorithm improvement ideas and parallel computing strategies. Research results indicate that the intelligent decision method of operation schemes combining the intelligent decision model and the optimization algorithm can reduce the energy consumption cost of the Yichang Pipeline by 7.22% on the premise of safe operation of the pipeline, and the energy-saving effect is obvious. The improved processing method of mutation decision variables beyond bounds and the mutation operator of discrete decision variables based on the floating-point rounding can improve the reliability of the optimization results of crude oil pipeline operation schemes, and the former can reduce the optimization computation time by at least half, and the latter can reduce the optimization computation time by at least two-thirds. There are some differences in the advantages and disadvantages of different parallel computing strategies for different computer configurations. Under the optimal parallel computing strategy, the optimization computation time on the server reduces from 220 s to 10 s, and the acceleration ratio can reach 22 times. It can be seen that the acceleration ratio of optimization computation can be accelerated by over 130 times by using the fast intelligent decision method of operation schemes combining the algorithm improvement ideas and parallel computing strategies, and the optimization computation time significantly reduces. The above results demonstrate the effectiveness of the intelligent decision method for the fast operation optimization of the crude oil pipeline. 14 figs, 35 refs.

References:

[1] 吴长春,左丽丽.关于中国智慧管道发展的认识与思考[J].油气储运,2020,39(4):361-370.
WU Chang-chun, ZUO Li-li. Understanding and thinking on the development of China's intelligent pipeline[J]. Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation, 2020, 39(4): 361-370.(in Chinese)
[2] 税碧垣,张 栋,李 莉,等.智慧管网主要特征与建设构想[J].油气储运,2020,39(5):500-505.
SHUI Bi-yuan, ZHANG Dong, LI Li, et al. Main characteristics and construction conception of intelligent pipeline network[J]. Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation, 2020, 39(5): 500-505.(in Chinese)
[3] 左丽丽,曾春雷,姜 勇,等.长呼原油管道月度节能优化方案[J].油气储运,2015,34(5):515-518.
ZUO Li-li, ZENG Chun-lei, JIANG Yong, et al. Program for optimization of monthly energy preservation in the Changqing-Hohhot Crude Oil Pipeline[J]. Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation, 2015, 34(5): 515-518.(in Chinese)
[4] ZHOU Ming, ZHANG Yu, JIN Shi-jiu. Dynamic optimization of heated oil pipeline operation using PSO-DE algorithm[J]. Measurement, 2015, 59: 344-351.
[5] 吕梦芸.基于模拟退火-蚁群算法的原油管道顺序输送运行优化模型[J].油气储运,2017,36(10):1154-1161.
LYU Meng-yun. The operation optimization model of crude oil batch transportation pipeline based on the simulated annealing-ant colony algorithm[J]. Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation, 2017, 36(10): 1154-1161.(in Chinese)
[6] BEKIBAYEV T, ZHAPBASBAYEV U, RAMAZANOVA G. Optimal regimes of heavy oil transportation through a heated pipeline[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2022, 115: 27-35.
[7] 王军防,矫 捷,余红梅,等.基于群体智能优化的原油管道系统能耗优化方法[J].油气储运,2022,41(11):1269-1276.
WANG Jun-fang, JIAO Jie, YU Hong-mei, et al. Optimization method for energy consumption of crude oil pipeline systems based on swarm intelligence optimization[J]. Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation, 2022, 41(11): 1269-1276.(in Chinese)
[8] YUAN Qing, CHEN Zhi-min, WANG Xin-ran, et al. Investigation and improvement of intelligent evolutionary algorithms for the energy cost optimization of an industry crude oil pipeline system[J]. Engineering Optimization, 2023, 55(5): 856-875.
[9] YUAN Qing, GAO Yu-yao, LUO Yi-yang, et al. Study on the optimal operation scheme of a heated oil pipeline system under complex industrial conditions[J]. Energy,2023(272): 127139.
[10] 王 森,马志鹏,李善综,等.梯级水库群优化调度并行动态规划方法[J].中国农村水利水电,2017(11):204-207.
WANG Sen, MA Zhi-peng, LI Shan-zong, et al. Parallel dynamic programming for the optimal operation of cascaded reservoirs[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2017(11): 204-207.(in Chinese)
[11] 纪昌明,马皓宇,李传刚,等.基于可行域搜索映射的并行动态规划[J].水利学报,2018,49(6):649-661.
JI Chang-ming, MA Hao-yu, LI Chuan-gang, et al. Research on parallel dynamic programming based on feasible region search mapping[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2018, 49(6): 649-661.(in Chinese)
[12] 蒋志强,纪昌明,孙 平,等.多层嵌套动态规划并行算法在梯级水库优化调度中的应用[J].中国农村水利水电,2014(9):70-75.
JIANG Zhi-qiang, JI Chang-ming, SUN Ping, et al. The application of multilayer nested parallel dynamic programming algorithm in cascade reservoirs operation optimization[J]. China Rural Water andHydropower, 2014(9): 70-75.(in Chinese)
[13] 左丽丽,戴材炜,赵思睿,等.分枝定界法与内点法耦合的含环路输气管网运行优化[J].油气储运,2023,42(3):343-351.
ZUO Li-li, DAI Cai-wei, ZHAO Si-rui, et al. Optimization on operation of gas pipeline network with cyclic structures by coupling branch-and-bound method with interior point method[J]. Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation, 2023, 42(3): 343-351.(in Chinese)
[14] HERRERA F, LOZANO M, VERDEGAY J L. Tackling real-coded genetic algorithms:operators and tools for behavioural analysis[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1998, 12: 265-319.
[15] KENNEDY J, EBERHART R. Particle swarm optimization[C]∥IEEE. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. New York: IEEE, 1995: 1942-1948.
[16] STORN R, PRICE K. Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 1997, 11(4): 341-359.
[17] WU Xia, LI Chang-jun, HE Yu-fa, et al. Operation optimization of natural gas transmission pipelines based on stochastic optimization algorithms: a review[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 2018: 1-18.
[18] 王 森,马志鹏,李善综,等.梯级水库群优化调度并行自适应混沌整体退火遗传算法[J].人民珠江,2016,37(2):88-91.
WANG Sen, MA Zhi-peng, LI Shan-zong, et al. Parallel self-adaptive chaos whole annealing genetic algorithm for optimal operation of cascaded reservoirs[J]. Pearl River, 2016, 37(2): 88-91.(in Chinese)
[19] 王 森,马志鹏,李善综,等.基于Fork/Join多核并行框架的梯级水库群优化调度[J].水利水电科技进展,2017,37(2):48-54.
WANG Sen, MA Zhi-peng, LI Shan-zong, et al. Optimal operation of cascaded reservoirs based on Fork/Join multi-core parallel framework[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2017, 37(2): 48-54.(in Chinese)
[20] LI Bo, HE Miao, KANG Yang, et al. A hybrid meta-heuristic solution to operation optimization of hot oil pipeline[C]∥IEEE. IOP Conference Series:Materials Science and Engineering. New York: IEEE, 2019: 1-10.
[21] ZHANG Hai-fei, GE Hong-wei, YANG Jie-ming, et al. Combining affinity propagation with differential evolution for three-echelon logistics distribution optimization[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 131: 109787.
[22] 吴长春,严大凡.热油管道稳态运行的两级递阶优化模型[J].石油学报,1989,10(3):109-117.
WU Chang-chun, YAN Da-fan. A two-level hierarchical model for optimizing steady operation of hot oil pipelines[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1989, 10(3): 109-117.(in Chinese)
[23] 吴长春,李东风,赵忠德.秦京管道稳态优化运行方案的分析与确定[J].油气储运,2002,21(12):4-11.
WU Chang-chun, LI Dong-feng, ZHAO Zhong-de. Steady operational optimization of Qinhuangdao to Beijing Hot Oil Pipeline[J]. Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation, 2002, 21(12): 4-11.(in Chinese)
[24] VESTERSTROM J, THOMSEN R. A comparative study of differential evolution, particle swarm optimization,and evolutionary algorithms on numerical benchmark problems[C]∥IEEE. Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. New York: IEEE, 2004: 1980-1987.
[25] DEB A, ROY J S, GUPTA B. Performance comparison of differential evolution, particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm in the design of circularly polarized microstrip antennas[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2014, 62(8): 3920-3928.
[26] CHARALAMPAKIS A E, TSIATAS G C. Critical evaluation of metaheuristic algorithms for weight minimization of truss structures[J]. Frontiers in Built Environment, 2019, DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2019.00113.
[27] NANDI S, REDDY M J. Comparative performance evaluation of self-adaptive differential evolution with GA, SCE and DE algorithms for the automatic calibration of a computationally intensive distributed hydrological model[J]. H2 Open Journal, 2020, 3(1): 306-327.
[28] BREST J, GREINER S, BOSKOVIC B, et al. Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: a comparative study on numerical benchmark problems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, 10(6): 646-657.
[29] 袁 庆,杨 洋,侯 昊,等.含蜡原油双结构参数模型参数回归的稳定性[J].油气储运,2018,37(3):269-275.
YUAN Qing, YANG Yang, HOU Hao, et al. The stability of parameter regression for double-structural-parameters model of waxy crude oil[J]. Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation, 2018, 37(3): 269-275.(in Chinese)
[30] YUAN Qing, LIU Hong-fei, LI Jing-fa, et al. Study on the parametric regression of a multiparameter thixotropic model for waxy crude oil[J]. Energy and Fuels, 2018, 32(4): 5020-5032.
[31] 郑 帅,王子涵,赵浩然,等.基于差分进化算法的飞机油量传感器布局优化方法[J].航空学报,2022,43(8):125809.
ZHENG Shuai, WANG Zi-han, ZHAO Hao-ran, et al. Layout optimization method of aircraft fuel gauging sensor based on differential evolution algorithm[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(8): 125809.(in Chinese)
[32] ZOU De-xuan, GAO Li-qun, LI S, et al. Solving 0-1 knapsack problem by a novel global harmony search algorithm[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2011, 11(2): 1556-1564.
[33] HE Xing-shi, HAN Lin. A novel binary differential evolution algorithm based on artificial immune system[C]∥IEEE. 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. New York: IEEE, 2007: 2267-2272.
[34] 孔祥勇,高立群,欧阳海滨,等.无参数变异的二进制差分进化算法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2014,35(4):484-488.
KONG Xiang-yong, GAO Li-qun, OUYANG Hai-bin, et al. Binary differential evolution algorithm based on parameterless mutation strategy[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2014, 35(4): 484-488.(in Chinese)
[35] 王 森,马志鹏,李善综,等.粗粒度并行自适应混合粒子群算法及其在梯级水库群优化调度中的应用[J].长江科学院院报,2017,34(7):149-154.
WANG Sen, MA Zhi-peng, LI Shan-zong, et al. Coarse-grained parallel adaptive hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm and its application to optimal operation of cascaded reservoirs[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2017, 34(7): 149-154.(in Chinese)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-11-10