|Table of Contents|

Operational benefit evaluation model of flexible parking incentive mechanism based on game theory(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2019年04期
Page:
161-170
Research Field:
交通运输规划与管理
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Operational benefit evaluation model of flexible parking incentive mechanism based on game theory
Author(s):
JI Yan-jie1;  GAO Liang-peng2;  CHEN Dan-dan1;  TANG Dou-nan3
(1. School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, China; 2. School ofTransportation,Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350118, Fujian, China; 3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley 94710, California, USA)
Keywords:
traffic management;  flexible parking incentive mechanism;  game theory;  benefit evaluation;  shared parking;  economic subsidy
PACS:
U491.7
DOI:
-
Abstract:
The dynamic game process between car travelers and parking managers under the parking mechanism was analyzed. The quantitative relationships between the travelers' bidding behavior, individual travel cost and parking incentive intensity were studied. The operational benefit evaluation model for the flexible parking incentive mechanism was conducted. The sensitivity analysis method was used to explore the effects of various factors on the operational efficiency of flexible parking incentive mechanism, and an empirical study of the University of California, Berkeley was carried out. Analysis result shows that the flexible parking incentive mechanism can not only ensure the sustainability of daily operation of parking lot, but also promote the sharing of parking berths. In terms of economic benefit, the flexible parking incentive mechanism can adjust the number of reclaimed berths through the change of incentive intensity. When the maximum incentive intensity increases from $15 to $30, the number of reclaimed berths reduces from 17 to 8, showing that the mechanism can ensure the economic benefits of parking lot by selectively rejecting the high price berths. As the proportion of people who can accept the minimum incentive increases, the marginal benefit of reclaimed berth will increase. When the proportion increases from 5% to 55%, the marginal benefit increases from $14.4 per berth to $17.3 per berth, showing that with the increase of the number of bidders, the economic benefit of parking lot improves gradually. In terms of social efficiency, the implementation of flexible parking incentive mechanism can help to release the parking berth resources. For example, the daily velocity rate will decrease by about 9%, and the minimum vacancy rate will show an unbalanced increase of 0-8%, showing that the mechanism can effectively promote the travelers to share the parking berths actively. 3 tabs, 10 figs, 28 refs.

References:

[1] 姚恩建,张正超,张嘉霖,等.居住区共享泊位资源优化配置模型及算法[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2017,17(2):160-167.
YAO En-jian, ZHANG Zheng-chao, ZHANG Jia-lin, et al. A model and algorithm for optimization of the utilization of residential shared parking slots[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(2): 160-167.(in Chinese)
[2] 王建军,金书鑫,李维佳,等.多方综合效益最大化的社会公共停车场停车收费定价方法[J].交通运输工程学报,2017,17(2):126-135.
WANG Jian-jun, JIN Shu-xin, LI Wei-jia, et al. Parking pricing method of public parking lots based on multi-aspect comprehensive benefit maximization[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17(2): 126-135.(in Chinese)
[3] LEE R, REES R, WATTEN M. Smart growth parking
requirements review[J]. Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2010, 80(12): 36-40.
[4] LALANI N. Evaluating shared parking for new developments[J]. Public Works, 1984, 115(2): 64.
[5] STEIN H S, RESHA J. Shared parking in the Portland
metropolitan area[R]. Beaverton: Stein Engineering, 1999.
[6] ABBOTT N T, BIGAZZI A Y. Utilizing shared parking to mitigate imbalanced supply in a dense urban neighborhood: case study in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2017, 2651(1): 92-100.
[7] KELLY J A, CLINCH J P. Temporal variance of revealed preference on-street parking price elasticity[J]. Transport Policy, 2009, 16(4): 193-199.
[8] OTTOSSON D B, CHEN C, WANG T T, et al. The
sensitivity of on-street parking demand in response to price changes: a case study in Seattle, WA[J]. Transport Policy, 2013, 25: 222-232.
[9] PIERCE G, SHOUP D. Getting the prices right: an evaluation of pricing parking by demand in San Francisco[R]. Berkeley: University of California Transportation Center, 2013.
[10] PIERCE G, WILLSON H, SHOUP D. Optimizing the use of public garages: Pricing parking by demand [J]. Transport Policy, 2015, 44: 89-95.
[11] MILLARD-BALL A, WEINBERGER R R, HAMPSHIRE R C. Is the curb 80% full or 20% empty? Assessing the impacts of San Francisco's parking pricing experiment[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014, 63: 76-92.
[12] 秦延平,刘灿齐,黄 鸣.泊位共享在解决区域交通拥堵中的应用[J].交通与港航,2008,22(3):51-53.
QIN Yan-ping, LIU Can-qi, HUANG Ming. Application of berth shared in solving regional traffic jams[J]. Communication and Shipping, 2008, 22(3): 51-53.(in Chinese)
[13] 陈永茂,过秀成,冉江宇.城市建筑物配建停车设施对外共享的可行性研究[J].现代城市研究,2010(1):21-25.
CHEN Yong-mao, GUO Xiu-cheng, RAN Jiang-yu. The shared parking feasibility of appertaining parking facilities to the building in cities[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2010(1): 21-25.(in Chinese)
[14] 肖 飞,张利学,晏克非.基于泊位共享的停车需求预测[J].城市交通,2009,7(3):73-79.
XIAO Fei, ZHANG Li-xue, YAN Ke-fei. Parking demand forecasting based on parking space sharing[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2009, 7(3): 73-79.(in Chinese)
[15] 薛行健,欧心泉,晏克非.基于泊位共享的新城区停车需求预测[J].城市交通,2010,8(5):52-56.
XUE Xing-jian, OU Xin-quan, YAN Ke-fei. Parking demand forecasting for spacesharing facility in new urban area[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2010, 8(5): 52-56.(in Chinese)
[16] 苏 靖,关宏志,秦焕美.基于泊位共享效用的混合用地停车需求比例研究[J].城市交通,2013,11(3):42-46.
SU Jing, GUAN Hong-zhi, QIN Huan-mei. Shared parking facility for mixed parking demand generated by different types of land use[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2013, 11(3): 42-46.(in Chinese)
[17] 陈 峻,谢 凯.中心城区高校停车泊位共享的动态分配模型及效果评价[J].中国公路学报,2015,28(11):104-111.
CHEN Jun, XIE Kai. Dynamic allocation model and effect evaluation of campus shared-use parking in central city[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2015, 28(11): 104-111.(in Chinese)
[18] 陈 峻,王 斌,张 楚.基于时空容量的配建停车资源共享匹配方法[J].中国公路学报,2018,31(3):96-115.
CHEN Jun, WANG Bin, ZHANG Chu. Parking resource sharing and matching methods for appertaining parking facilities based on space-time capacity[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(3): 96-115.(in Chinese)
[19] 何梦园,刘正熙,熊运余,等.数据驱动的通勤团体配对共享停车方法研究[J].计算机应用研究,2018,37(1):1-6.
HE Meng-yuan, LIU Zheng-xi, XIONG Yun-yu, et al. Research on paired shared parking for commuter groups driven by data[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2018, 37(1): 1-6.(in Chinese)
[20] 张文会,苏永民,戴 静,等.居住区共享停车泊位分配模型[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2019,19(1):89-96.
ZHANG Wen-hui, SU Yong-min, DAI Jing, et al. Distributing model for shared parking in the residential zones[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2019, 19(1): 89-96.(in Chinese)
[21] 李玉龙,毛 鹏,罗 杰,等.“互联网+”视角下的住区停车位工作日共享机制研究[J].工程管理学报,2018,32(2):68-73.
LI Yu-long, MAO Peng, LUO Jie, et al. The mechanism design of parking space in residential area based on internet plus model[J]. Journal of Engineering Management, 2018, 32(2): 68-73.(in Chinese)
[22] SHAO Chao-yi, YANG Hai, ZHANG Yi, et al. A simple reservation and allocation model of shared parking lots[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2016, 71: 303-312.
[23] XIAO Hao-han, XU Meng, GAO Zi-you. Shared parking
problem: a novel truthful double auction mechanism Approach[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2018, 109: 40-69.
[24] XIAO Hao-han, XU Meng. How to restrain participants opt out in shared parking market? A fair recurrent double auction approach[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 93: 36-61.
[25] MA Rui-qu, LAM P T I, LEUNG C K. Potential pitfalls of smart city development: a study on parking mobile applications(apps)in Hong Kong[J]. Telematics and Informatics, 2018, 35(6): 1580-1592.
[26] TANG Dou-nan, LIN Zi-heng, SENGUPTA R. A casual analysis of FlexPass: incentive for reducing parking demand[C]∥TRB. Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting. Washington DC: TRB, 2016: 1-19.
[27] 陈 莎,夏 俐.排队系统定价控制问题的研究综述[J].控制理论与应用,2018,35(1):41-55.
CHEN Sha, XIA Li. Research review of pricing control for queueing systems[J]. Control Theory and Applications, 2018, 35(1): 41-55.(in Chinese)
[28] JI Yan-jie, GAO Liang-peng, CHEN Xiao-shi, et al. Strategies for multi-step-ahead available parking spaces forecasting based on wavelet transform[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(6): 1503-1512.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-09-03