|Table of Contents|

Fatigue damage characteristics of rib-to-deck weld root on orthotropic steel bridge deck(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2018年01期
Page:
1-12
Research Field:
道路与铁道工程
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Fatigue damage characteristics of rib-to-deck weld root on orthotropic steel bridge deck
Author(s):
ZHOU Xu-hong1; 2; 3;  PENG Xi1;  QIN Feng-jiang2; 3;  DI Jin2; 3
1. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, Shaanxi, China; 2. Key Laboratory of New Technologyfor Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
Keywords:
bridge engineering;  orthotropic steel bridge deck;  deck;  rib;  root of weld joint;  stress influence surface;  fatigue life
PACS:
U448.36
DOI:
-
Abstract:
For the problems that the root-deck fatigue cracks of orthotropic steel decks with closed ribs located inside ribs were invisible and greatly harmful, the deck root welding fatigue details were divided into RD details(rib-to-deck details)and RDF details(rib-to-deck details crossing floor beams)according to the connected locations of longitudinal ribs and deck, and the finite element method was applied to study the stress influence surfaces of two fatigue details. The transverse frequency distribution of wheelmark, multiaxial loads and pavement-deck interaction were considered, and the damage characteristics of two fatigue details were analyzed. Analysis result shows that the target details are in the most unfavorable condition when the wheel is right above each of them. In the longitudinal direction, the stress is relatively higher when the distances of wheel load and target details are no more than 0.6 m. In the transverse direction, the wheel load influence ranges of two details are within 1.0 m. When the transverse distribution of wheelmark is considered, the transverse reduction coefficients of equivalent stress ranges of two details in simplified computation are 0.92 and 0.96, respectively. Under the dual-axle and tri-axle loads, the damages of RD details are 2.10 times and 3.21 times of the damage under single-axle load, respectively. It is unsafe to compute the damage by approximately adding the damage of each axis load, so it is suggested to consider vehicle type while assessing the fatigue life. The stress range of each detail obviously reduces when the pavement-deck interaction is considered, and the change will increase with the increase of elastic modulus of pavement. The stress range of deck with 12 mm thickness considering pavement is almost equal to the range of bare deck with 16 mm thickness at the welding root. For the simplified diffusion model of pavement with 45° dispersion angle, when the thickness of deck is no less than 16 mm, the stress range is simultaneously less than the range of soild model considering the contributions of diffusion and stiffness of pavement, and the difference increases with the increase of thickness of deck, so it is slightly risky to simplify the dispersion effect of pavement without considering its scope of application. When the thickness of deck is 18 mm and the contribution of pavement is considered, the fatigue lifes of two details can meet the design requirement of service life, and RDF details are about 67% of RD details in fatigue life. 6 tabs, 17 figs, 28 refs.

References:

[1] MADDOX S J. The fatigue behavior of trapezoidal stiffener to deck plate welds in orthotropic bridge decks[R]. Wokingham: Transport Research Laboratory, 1974.
[2] YA S, YAMADA K, ISHIKAWA T. Fatigue durability of trough rib to deck plate welded detail of some orthotropic steel decks[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2010, 56A: 77-90.
[3] XIAO Zhi-gang, YAMADA K, YA S, et al. Stress analyses and fatigue evaluation of rib-to-deck joints in steel orthotropic decks[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2008, 30(8): 1387-1397.
[4] 曾志斌.正交异性钢桥面板典型疲劳裂纹分类及其原因分析[J].钢结构,2011,26(2):9-15,26.ZENG Zhi-bin. Classification and reasons of typical fatigue cracks in orthotropic steel deck[J]. Steel Construction, 2011, 26(2): 9-15, 26.(in Chinese)
[5] MORI T, SHIGIHARA S, NAKAMURA H.Fatigue tests on welded connections between deck plate and trough rib in steel plate deck in consideration of weld penetration[J]. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu A, 2006, 62(3): 570-581.
[6] TSAKOPOULOS P A, FISHER J W. Full-scale fatigue tests of steel orthotropic decks for the Williamsburg Bridge[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2003, 8(5): 323-333.
[7] SIM H B, UANG C M, SIKORSKY C. Effects of fabrication procedures on fatigue resistance of welded joints in steel orthotropic decks[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2009, 14(5): 366-373.
[8] 张允士,李法雄,熊 锋,等.正交异性钢桥面板疲劳裂纹成因分析及控制[J].公路交通科技,2013,30(8):75-80.ZHANG Yun-shi, LI Fa-xiong, XIONG Feng, et al. Cause analysis and control measures of fatigue cracks in orthotropic steel deck[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2013, 30(8): 75-80.(in Chinese)
[9] AASHTO, AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications(2005)[S].
[10] TSAKOPOULOS P A, FISHER J W. Full-scale fatigue tests of steel orthotropic deck panel for the Bronx-Whitestone Bridge rehabilitation[J]. Bridge Structures, 2005, 1(1): 55-66.
[11] FISHER J W, BARSOM J M.Evaluation of cracking in the rib-to-deck welds of the Bronx-Whitestone Bridge[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016, 21(3): 04015065-1-10.
[12] KAINUMA S, YANG Mu-ye, JEONG Young-soo, et al. Experimental investigation for structural parameter effects on fatigue behavior of rib-to-deck welded joints in orthotropic steel decks[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2017, 79: 520-537.
[13] 唐 亮,黄李骥,刘 高,等.正交异性钢桥面板顶板贯穿型疲劳裂纹研究[J].公路交通科技,2012,29(2):59-66.TANG Liang, HUANG Li-ji, LIU Gao, et al. Research on fatigue cracks through deck-plate in orthotropic steel deck[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2012, 29(2): 59-66.(in Chinese)
[14] 吉伯海,陈 祥,刘 荣,等.钢桥面板顶板与U肋接头疲劳效应分析[J].建筑钢结构进展,2014,16(6):56-62.JI Bo-hai, CHEN Xiang, LIU Rong, et al. A numerical study on the fatigue effect of trough-deck plate weld joint to steel bridge deck system[J]. Progress in Steel Building Structures, 2014, 16(6): 56-62.(in Chinese)
[15] 王春生,翟慕赛,唐友明,等.钢桥面板疲劳裂纹耦合扩展机理的数值断裂力学模拟[J].中国公路学报,2017,30(3):82-95.WANG Chun-sheng, ZHAI Mu-sai, TANG You-ming, et al. Numerical fracture mechanical simulation of fatigue crack coupled propagation mechanism for steel bridge deck[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(3): 82-95.(in Chinese)
[16] 蒲黔辉,高立强,刘振标,等.基于热点应力法的正交异性钢桥面板疲劳验算[J].西南交通大学学报,2013,48(3):395-401.PU Qian-hui, GAO Li-qiang, LIU Zhen-biao, et al. fatigue assessment of orthotropic steel bridge deck based on hot spot stress method[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 48(3): 395-401.(in Chinese)
[17] 王春生,付炳宁,张 芹,等.正交异性钢桥面板足尺疲劳试验[J].中国公路学报,2013,26(2):69-76.WANG Chun-sheng, FU Bing-ning, ZHANG Qin, et al. Fatigue test on full-scale orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2013, 26(2): 69-76.(in Chinese)
[18] 赵 秋,吴 冲.U肋加劲板焊接残余应力数值模拟分析[J].工程力学,2012,29(8):262-268.ZHAO Qiu, WU Chong.Numerical analysis of welding residual stress of U-rib stiffened plate[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(8): 262-268.(in Chinese)
[19] 卫 星,邹修兴,姜 苏,等.正交异性钢桥面肋-板焊接残余应力的数值模拟[J].桥梁建设,2014,44(4):27-33.WEI Xing, ZOU Xiu-xing, JIANG Su, et al. Numerical simulation of residual stress in rib-to-top plate welding of orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. Bridge Construction, 2014, 44(4): 27-33.(in Chinese)
[20] LIU Rong, JI Bo-hai, WANG Man-man, et al. Numerical evaluation of toe-deck fatigue in orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2015, 29(6): 04014180-1-10.
[21] 黄 卫.大跨径桥梁钢桥面铺装设计[J].土木工程学报,2007,40(9):65-77.HUANG Wei. Design of deck pavement for long-span steel bridges[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2007, 40(9): 65-77.(in Chinese)
[22] 陈磊磊,钱振东.基于简单性能试验的环氧沥青混合料动态模量研究[J].建筑材料学报,2013,16(2):341-344.CHEN Lei-lei, QIAN Zhen-dong. Study on dynamic modulus of epoxy asphalt mixture based on simple performance test[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2013, 16(2): 341-344.(in Chinese)
[23] 吴 冲,刘海燕,张志宏,等.桥面铺装温度对正交异性钢桥面板疲劳的影响[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,2013,41(8):1213-1218.WU Chong, LIU Hai-yan, ZHANG Zhi-hong, et al. Influence of pavements temperature on fatigue life of orthotropic deck of steel bridge[J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 2013, 41(8): 1213-1218.(in Chinese)
[24] 傅中秋,吉伯海,王满满,等.考虑桥面铺装作用的正交异性钢桥面板应力幅分析[J].工业建筑,2015,45(5):143-145,151.FU Zhong-qiu, JI Bo-hai, WANG Man-man, et al. Stress amplitude analysis of orthotropic steel bridge deck with pavement[J]. Industrial Construction, 2015, 45(5): 143-145, 151.(in Chinese)
[25] 中交公路规划设计院有限公司.广东虎门二桥工可研究阶段公路桥梁车辆荷载专题研究[R]. 北京:中交公路规划设计院有限公司,2015.CCCC Highway Consultants Co., Ltd. Monographic study on highway bridge vehicle loads of the Second Humen Bridge in the project feasibility stage[R]. Beijing: CCCC Highway Consultants Co., Ltd., 2015.(in Chinese)
[26] YA S, YAMADA K, ISHIKAWA T. Fatigue evaluation of rib-to-deck welded joints of orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2011, 16(4): 492-499.
[27] 陈一馨,吕彭民,郭成军,等.钢桥面板U肋与盖板焊缝构造细节疲劳性能评估[J].长安大学学报:自然科学版,2014,34(1):49-55.CHEN Yi-xin, LU Peng-min, GUO Cheng-jun. Study on fatigue performance of orthotropic steel bridge deck U-rib and cover weld structure[J]. Journal of Chang’an University: Natural Science Edition, 2014, 34(1): 49-55.(in Chinese)
[28] FU Zhong-qiu, JI Bo-hai, ZHANG Cheng-yi, et al. Fatigue performance of roof and U-rib weld of orthotropic steel bridge deck with different penetration rates[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2017, 22(6): 04017016-1-12.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-03-28