|Table of Contents|

Dynamic response of bridge pile foundation near fault under strong earthquake(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2022年04期
Page:
159-169
Research Field:
道路与铁道工程
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Dynamic response of bridge pile foundation near fault under strong earthquake
Author(s):
FENG Zhong-ju1;  ZHANG Cong1;  HE Jing-bin2;  GUAN Yun-hui3;  YUAN Feng-bin4
(1. School of Highway, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China; 2. Northwest Engineering Co., Ltd., Power China, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China; 3. SCEGC Mechanized Construction Group Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China; 4. Beijing JianDa Road and Bridge Consulting Co., Ltd., Beijing 102308, China)
Keywords:
bridge engineering;  pile foundation;  shaking table test;  strong earthquake;  fault fracture zone;  dynamic response
PACS:
U443.1
DOI:
10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.04.012
Abstract:
In order to find out the difference in the dynamic responses of bridge piles on the hanging wall and footwall of the fault under a strong earthquake, relying on the Haiwen Bridge project in Hainan Province, the shaking table model test was carried out to study the response differences of pile acceleration, pile top relative displacement and pile bending moment response laws, and the piles damage characteristics on the hanging wall and footwall of the fault under the action of 0.15g-0.60g ground motion intensity. Research result shows that the difference between pile top peak accelerations on the hanging wall and footwall of the fault is 0.291-0.488 m·s-2, and the difference in the amplification factor of pile top acceleration is 0.067-0.195 under the different ground motion intensities. The reason is the difference in the influence range of the fault on the rock and soil mass on both sides and the “non-linear” difference of the rock and soil mass around the pile. With the increase of earthquake intensity, the difference between the pile top relative displacements on the hanging wall and footwall of the fault increases gradually, and the maximum difference is 0.77 mm. The difference between the maximum bending moments of the pile foundations on the hanging wall and footwall of the fault is 5.294-82.932 kN·m, and the maximum bending moment occurs at the interface of soft and hard soil and near the bedrock surface. The reason is that the footwall, as a stable plate, is squeezed by the soil mass of the hanging wall, which has a certain inhibitory effect on the vibration and shear of the rock and soil mass of the footwall. When the ground motion strength is 0.35g, the maximum bending moment of the pile on the hanging wall and footwall of the fault does not exceed the bending bearing capacity, which meets the requirement of seismic fortification intensity Ⅷ of Haiwen Bridge(0.35g). When the ground motion intensity is 0.35g-0.45g, the pile fundamental frequency on the hanging wall of the fault has a small variation range. When the ground motion intensity is 0.50g-0.60g, the pile foundation frequency on the hanging wall decreases significantly. The cracks appear at the connection between the pile top and cap, the interface between the soft and hard soil layer, and the bedrock surface, which shows that the piles have been damaged. In summary, the acceleration of pile, the relative displacement of pile top, and the bending moment of pile on the hanging wall are larger than those on the footwall. The dynamic response changes of the piles on the hanging wall and footwall of the fault are significantly different, which shows significant “the hanging wall effect of fault”. Therefore, in the seismic design of bridge pile foundation near the fault under strong earthquake, the seismic capacity of hanging wall pile foundation should be considered. 5 tabs, 15 figs, 30 refs.

References:

[1] FENG Zhong-ju, HUO Jian-wei, HU Hai-bo, et al. Research on corrosion damage and bearing characteristics of bridge pile foundation concrete under a dry-wet-freeze-thaw cycle[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 2021(6): 1-13.
[2] JIANG Guan, FENG Zhong-ju, ZHAO Rui-xin, et al. Case study on safety assessment of rockfall and splash stone protective structures for secondary excavation of highway slope[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 2021(2): 1-9.
[3] 冯忠居,陈慧芸,袁枫斌,等.桩-土-断层耦合作用下桥梁桩基竖向承载特性[J].交通运输工程学报,2019,19(2):36-48.
FENG Zhong-ju, CHEN Hui-yun, YUAN Feng-bin, et al. Vertical bearing characteristics of bridge pile foundation under pile-soil-fault coupling action[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(2): 36-48.(in Chinese)
[4] FENG Zhong-ju, HU Hai-bo, DONG Yun-xiu, et al. Effect of steel casing on vertical bearing characteristics of steel tube-reinforced concrete piles in loess area[J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(14): 2874.
[5] DONG Yun-xiu, FENG Zhong-ju, HU Hai-bo, et al. The horizontal bearing capacity of composite concrete-filled steel tube piles[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, 2020(1): 1-15.
[6] 何静斌,冯忠居,董芸秀,等.强震区桩-土-断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J].岩土力学,2020,41(7):2389-2400.
FENG Zhong-ju, HE Jing-bin, DONG Yun-xiu, et al. Dynamic response of pile foundation under pile-soil-fault coupling effect in meizoseismal area[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.(in Chinese)
[7] SOMERVILLE P G, SMITH N F, GRAVES R W, et al. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity [J].Seismological Research Letters, 1997, 68(1): 199-222
[8] WANG G Q, ZHOU X Y, ZHANG P Z, et al. Characteristics of amplitude and duration for near fault strong ground motion from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2002, 22(1): 73-96
[9] LU Chih-hung, LIU Kuang-yen, CHANG Kuo-chun. Seismic performance of bridges with rubber bearings: lessons learnt from the 1999 Chi-Chi Taiwan Earthquake [J]. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 2011, 34(7): 889-904.
[10] FENG Zhong-ju, HU Hai-bo, ZHAO Rui-xin, et al. Experiments on reducing negative skin friction of piles [J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 2019(4): 1-10.
[11] 张永亮,冯鹏飞,陈兴冲,等.基于静-动力分析相结合方法的桥梁桩基础地震反应分析及抗震性能评价[J].工程力学,2018,35(S1):325-329,343.
ZHANG Yong-liang, FENG Peng-fei, CHEN Xing-chong, et al. Seismic response analysis and seismic performance evaluation on bridge pile foundations based on the method combined static with dynamic analysis[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(S1): 325-329, 343.(in Chinese)
[12] 栾茂田,孔德森,杨 庆,等.层状土中单桩竖向简谐动力响应的简化解析方法[J].岩土力学,2005,26(3):375-380.
LUAN Mao-tian, KONG De-sen, YANG Qing, et al. Simplified analytic method of vertical harmonic response of single pile embedded in layered soils[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(3): 375-380.(in Chinese)
[13] 刘林超,杨 骁.地震作用下饱和土-桩-上部结构动力相互作用研究[J].岩土力学,2012,33(1):120-128.
LIU Lin-chao, YANG Xiao. Dynamic interaction of saturated soil-pile-structure system under seismic loading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(1): 120-128.(in Chinese)
[14] 许成顺,豆鹏飞,杜修力,等.液化场地-结构动力相互作用振动台试验发展与回顾[J].北京工业大学学报,2019,45(5):502-514.
XU Cheng-shun, DOU Peng-fei, DU Xiu-li, et al. Review on shaking table test of dynamic interaction of liquefiable site-structures system: retrospect and prospect[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2019, 45(5): 502-514.(in Chinese)
[15] 冯忠居,董芸秀,何静斌,等.强震作用下饱和粉细砂液化振动台试验[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2019,51(9):186-192.
FENG Zhong-ju, DONG Yun-xiu, HE Jing-bin, et al. Shaking table test of saturated fine sand liquefaction under strong earthquake[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019, 51(9): 186-192.(in Chinese)
[16] 刘 闯,冯忠居,张福强,等.地震作用下特大型桥梁嵌岩桩基础动力响应[J].交通运输工程学报,2018,18(4):53-62.
LIU Chuang, FENG Zhong-ju, ZHANG Fu-qiang, et al. Dynamic response of rock-socketed pile foundation for extra-large bridge under earthquake action[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(4): 53-62.(in Chinese)
[17] 冯忠居,王溪清,李孝雄,等.强震作用下的砂土液化对桩基力学特性影响[J].交通运输工程学报,2019,19(1):71-84.
FENG Zhong-ju, WANG Xi-qing, LI Xiao-xiong, et al. Effect of sand liquefaction on mechanical properties of pile foundation under strong earthquake[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(1): 71-84.(in Chinese)
[18] DONG Yun-xiu, FENG Zhong-ju, HU Hai-bo, et al. Seismic response of a bridge pile foundation during a shaking table test[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2019, 2019(2): 1-16.
[19] 蔡奇鹏,吴宏伟,胡 平,等.跨越走滑断层黏土地层动力响应离心机试验研究[J].岩土力学,2018,39(7):2424-2432.
CAI Qi-peng, WU Hong-wei, HU Ping, et al. Centrifuge experimental study of dynamic responses of clay stratum overlying a strike-slip fault[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(7): 2424-2432.(in Chinese)
[20] MAKRIS N, TAZOH T, YUN X, et al. Prediction of the measured response of a scaled soil-pile-superstructure system[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1997, 16(2): 113-124.
[21] 闫孔明,刘飞成,张建经,等.地震作用下含倾斜软弱夹层边坡内群桩的弯曲变形研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2017,36(8):1966-1976.
YAN Kong-ming, LIU Fei-cheng, ZHANG Jian-jing, et al. Bending deformation of pile group in the slope with intercalated weak layer under seismic excitations[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(8): 1966-1976.(in Chinese)
[22] 宋 波,谢明雷,李吉人.不同桩基形式高桩码头地震动力损伤振动台试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2018,51(S2):28-34.
SONG Bo, XIE Ming-lei, LI Ji-ren. Study of seismic dynamic damage on pile-supported wharf with different types of piles by shaking table test[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2018, 51(Sup 2): 28-34.(in Chinese)
[23] 谢 文,孙利民,楼梦麟.多点激励下桩-土-斜拉桥全模型振动台试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2019,52(5):79-89.
XIE Wen, SUN Li-min, LOU Meng-lin. Shaking table test on a pile-soil-cable-stayed bridge full model under multi-support excitations[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2019, 52(5): 79-89.(in Chinese)
[24] 江 辉,王 志,白晓宇,等.近、远场强震下深水桥梁-群桩基础的非线性响应及损伤特性[J].振动与冲击,2017,36(24):13-22.
JIANG Hui, WANG Zhi, BAI Xiao-yu, et al. Nonlinear responses and damage characteristics for group-piles foundation of a deep-water bridge under strong near-fault and far-field earthquakes[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(24): 13-22.(in Chinese)
[25] 贾 鹏,王兰民,万 征,等.某桥梁桩基础的抗震计算研究[J].地震工程学报,2018,40(2):258-264.
JIA Peng, WANG Lan-min, WAN Zheng, et al. Seismic calculation and analysis of the pile foundation of a certain bridge[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2018, 40(2): 258-264.(in Chinese)
[26] 李雨润,闫志晓,张 健, 等.饱和砂土中直群桩动力响应离心机振动台试验与简化数值模型研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(6):1252-1264.
LI Yu-run, YAN Zhi-xiao, ZHANG Jian, et al. Centrifugal shaking table test and numerical simulation of dynamic responses of straight pile group in saturated sand[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 39(6): 1252-1264.(in Chinese)
[27] ZHANG Cong, FENG Zhong-ju, GUAN Yun-hui, et al. Study on liquefaction resistance of pile group by shaking table test[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2022, 2022(12): 1-12.
[28] 陈国兴,王志华,左 熹,等.振动台试验叠层剪切型土箱的研制[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(1):89-97.
CHEN Guo-xing, WANG Zhi-hua, ZUO Xi, et al. Development of laminar shear soil container for shaking table tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(1): 89-97.(in Chinese)
[29] 伍小平,孙利民,胡世德,等.振动台试验用层状剪切变形土箱的研制[J].同济大学学报,2002,30(7):781-785.
WU Xiao-ping, SUN Li-min, HU Shi-de, et al. Development of laminar shear box used in shaking table test[J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2002, 30(7): 781-785.(in Chinese)
[30] 袁林娟,刘小生,汪小刚,等.振动台土-箱结构模型动力特性及反应的解析分析[J].岩土工程学报,2012,34(6):1038-1042.
YUAN Lin-juan, LIU Xiao-sheng, WANG Xiao-gang, et al. Analytic solution of dynamic characteristics and responses of soil-box model for shaking table tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(6): 1038-1042.(in Chinese)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-09-01