|Table of Contents|

Axial compression test of masonry short columns with ultra-high performance mortar(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2022年01期
Page:
93-102
Research Field:
道路与铁道工程
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Axial compression test of masonry short columns with ultra-high performance mortar
Author(s):
HUANG Qing-wei1;  LIAO Miao-xing1;  CHEN Bao-chun1;  LU Shao-bin1;  LIU Jun-ping1; LI Cong1;  HUANG Wen-jin2;  HUANG Xin-yi1
(1. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, China; 2.College of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, China)
Keywords:
bridge engineering;  UHPM masonry;  axial compression test;  stress mechanism;  ultimate bearing capacity;  calculation method
PACS:
U448.33
DOI:
10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.01.007
Abstract:
To improve the mechanical properties of masonry columns, a new masonry column with UHPM(UMC)based on the ultra-high performance mortar(UHPM)was proposed. Axial compression test were carried out on two groups of UMC with fired brick and concrete brick. By comparing with the conventional masonry columns(MC), the stress mechanism and failure mode of UMC were discussed. The applicability of formula for calculating the axial compression bearing capacity of masonry columns in the current specification to UMC was evaluated, and the prediction formula for the axial compression bearing capacity of UMC was proposed. Analysis results show that the whole stress process of UMC and MC is similar, which both experience the stress stage before cracking, cracking development stage and failure stage. The initial cracking load of UMC is much higher than that of MC, where, the values of UMC with fired brick and concrete brick are 2.36 and 2.45 times than those of MC, respectively, and both are greater than the ultimate load of MC. Both the UMC and MC lost their bearing capacity due to the block failure. The failure mode of MC shows obvious brittleness, and the cracks mainly develop at the interface between the mortar and the block. However, the failure of UMC shows good ductility, and the crushing degree of block is much larger than that of MC. Compared with MC, mortar in UMC is no longer a weak part, and the UHPM plays a constraint role on the lateral deformation of the block, which can significantly improve the bearing capacity of the masonry column. The compression bearing capacities of UMC with fired brick and concrete brick are 1.74 and 2.00 times that of MC, respectively, indicating that the application of UHPM in masonry structure is quite feasible. The strength calculation formula for MC in the current specification will overestimate the bearing capacity of UMC. The proposed UMC strength calculation formula for UMC takes into account the strength of block and the constraint effect of UHPM on the block. 8 tabs, 9 figs, 25 refs.

References:

[1] 苑振芳,刘 斌.我国砌体结构的发展状况与展望[J].建筑结构,1999,29(10):9-13.YUAN Zhen-fang, LIU Bin. The state of development and suggestion on masonry structure in China[J]. Building Structure, 1999, 29(10): 9-13.(in Chinese)
[2] PODESTÀ S. A damage model for the analysis of the seismic response of monumental buildings[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2005, 9(3): 419-444.
[3] RADIVOJEVIC A, KURTOVIC-FOLIC N. Evolution of bricks and brick masonry in the early history of its use in the region of today's Serbia[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2006, 18(5): 692-699.
[4] SANDIN K. Mortars for masonry and rendering choice and application[J]. Building Issues, 1995, 9(3): 3-18.
[5] VENU MADHAVA RAO K, VENKATARAMA REDDY B V, JAGADISH K S. Strength characteristics of stone masonry[J]. Materials and Structures, 1997, 30(4): 233-237.
[6] 孙景江,马 强,石宏彬,等.汶川地震高烈度区城镇房屋震害简介[J].地震工程与工程振动,2008,28(3):7-15.SUN Jing-jiang, MA Qiang, SHI Hong-bin, et al. Building damage in cities and towns located in higher intensity areas during Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2008, 28(3): 7-15.(in Chinese)
[7] 李碧雄,谢和平,邓建辉,等.汶川地震中房屋建筑震害特征及抗震设计思考[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2009,29(2):224-230,236.LI Bi-xiong, XIE He-ping, DENG Jian-hui, et al. Characteristic analysis of performance and damage of buildings in Wenchuan earthquake and considerations in aseismic design of building[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2009, 29(2): 224-230, 236.(in Chinese)
[8] 方 圆,陈 兵.玻璃纤维对磷酸镁水泥砂浆力学性能的增强作用及机理[J].材料导报,2017,31(24):6-9,39.FANG Yuan, CHEN Bing. The enhancement and mechanism of glass fiber on mechanical properties of magnesium phosphate cement mortar[J]. Materials Review, 2017, 31(24): 6-9, 39.(in Chinese)
[9] 王培铭,许 绮,STARK J.桥面用丁苯乳液改性水泥砂浆的力学性能[J].建筑材料学报,2001,4(1):1-6.WANG Pei-ming, XU Qi, STARK J. Mechanical properties of styrene-butadiene emulsion modified cement mortar used for repair of bridge surface[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2001, 4(1): 1-6.(in Chinese)
[10] 陈华光,熊剑平.三种乳液改性路用水泥修补砂浆力学性能研究[J].公路与汽运,2005(2):75-77. CHEN Hua-guang, XIONG Jian-ping. Mechanical properties of three kinds of emulsion modified cement mortar for road repair[J]. Highways and Automotive Applications, 2005(2): 75-77.(in Chinese)
[11] 郑志伟,龚爱民,彭玉林.丙烯酸酯共聚乳液改性水泥砂浆性能的试验研究[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学),2007,22(3):427-430. ZHENG Zhi-wei, GONG Ai-min, PENG Yu-lin. Experimental study of performance of propylene diethylene glycol dinitrate copolymerization emulsion modified cement mortar[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition), 2007, 22(3): 427-430.(in Chinese)
[12] 易伟建,农金龙,黄政宇,等.聚合物乳液改性砂浆的长期粘结性能[J].硅酸盐通报,2011,30(4):938-942,949.YI Wei-jian, NONG Jin-long, HUANG Zheng-yu, et al. Research on long-time interfacial bonding performance of polymer modified cement-based mortars[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society,2011, 30(4): 938-942, 949.(in Chinese)
[13] 赵 维,李东旭,李清海.聚合物改性砂浆综述[J].材料导报,2010,24(11):136-140.ZHAO Wei, LI Dong-xu, LI Qing-hai. Review of polymer modified mortar[J]. Materials Review, 2010, 24(11): 136-140.(in Chinese)
[14] 王 超,刘兆爽,赵文杰.聚合物改性水泥基材料的机理研究进展[J].硅酸盐通报,2017,36(4):1254-1257,1265.WANG Chao, LIU Zhao-shuang, ZHAO Wen-jie. Research development on mechanism of polymer modified cement based materials[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2017, 36(4): 1254-1257, 1265.(in Chinese)
[15] LI Cong, CHEN Bao-chun, SU Jia-zhan, et al. Experimental study of ultra-high performance mortar masonry short columns under axial loads[C]∥TOUTLEMONDE F, RESPLENDINO J. Proceedings of the AFGC-ACI-fib-RILEM International Conference on Ultra-High Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concrete. Paris: RILEM Publication, 2017: 605-614.
[16] 陈宝春,季 韬,黄卿维,等.超高性能混凝土研究综述[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2014,31(3):1-24.CHEN Bao-chun, JI Tao, HUANG Qing-wei, et al. Review of research on ultra-high performance concrete[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2014, 31(3): 1-24.(in Chinese)
[17] 陈宝春,杨 简,黄卿维,等.超高性能混凝土形状与尺寸效应分析[J].福州大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(3):391-397.CHEN Bao-chun, YANG Jian, HUANG Qing-wei, et al. Analysis of shape and size effect of ultra-high performance concrete[J]. Journal of Fuzhou University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47(3): 391-397.(in Chinese)
[18] 陈宝春,杨 简,吴香国,等.UHPC力学性能的多指标分级[J].中国公路学报,2021,34(8):23-34.CHEN Bao-chun, YANG Jian, WU Xiang-guo, et al. Multi-indicators classification of UHPC mechanical properties[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(8): 23-34.(in Chinese)
[19] 杜任远,黄卿维,陈宝春.活性粉末混凝土桥梁应用与研究[J].世界桥梁,2013,41(1):69-74.DU Ren-yuan, HUANG Qing-wei, CHEN Bao-chun. Application and study of reactive powder concrete to bridge engineering[J]. World Bridges, 2013, 41(1): 69-74.(in Chinese)
[20] 黄卿维,杜任远,陈宝春.超高性能混凝土在桥梁结构中的应用[C]∥中国土木工程学会.第九届全国高强与高性能混凝土学术交流会论文集.福州:中国土木工程学会,2014:342-349.HUANG Qing-wei, DU Ren-yuan, CHEN Bao-chun. Application of ultra high performance concrete in bridge structure[C]∥China Civil Engineering Society. Proceeding of the Ninth National Conference on High Strength and High Performance Concrete. Fuzhou:China Civil Engineering Society, 2014: 342-349.(in Chinese)
[21] 邵旭东,樊 伟,黄政宇.超高性能混凝土在结构中的应用[J].土木工程学报,2021,54(1):1-13.SHAO Xu-dong, FAN Wei, HUANG Zheng-yu. Application of ultra-high-performance concrete in engineering structures[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2021, 54(1): 1-13.(in Chinese)
[22] 赵 筠,廉慧珍.关于超高性能混凝土(UHPC)的问答[J].混凝土世界,2016(4):98-103.ZHAO Yun, LIAN Hui-zhen. Questions and answers to ultra-high performance concrete(UHPC)[J]. China Concrete, 2016(4): 98-103.(in Chinese)
[23] RIDDINGTON J R, GHAZALI M Z. Hypothesis for shear failure in masonry joints[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1990, 89(1): 89-102.
[24] ALI S S, PAGE A W. Finite element model for masonry subjected to concentrated loads[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988, 114(8): 1761-1784.
[25] 杜任远,陈宝春.活性粉末混凝土拱极限承载力试验研究[J].工程力学,2013,30(5):42-48.DU Ren-yuan, CHEN Bao-chun. Experimental research on the ultimate load capacity of reactive powder concrete arches[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(5): 42-48.(in Chinese)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-03-20