|Table of Contents|

Subway passenger flow prediction based on optimized PSO-BP algorithm with coupled spatial-temporal characteristics(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2021年04期
Page:
210-222
Research Field:
交通运输规划与管理
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Subway passenger flow prediction based on optimized PSO-BP algorithm with coupled spatial-temporal characteristics
Author(s):
HUI Yang12 WANG Yong-gang1 PENG Hui1 HOU Shu-qian3
(1. Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Management, Control and Cycle Repair Technology for Traffic Network Facilities in Ecological Security Barrier Area, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China; 2. Transportation Soft Science Research Center, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China; 3. Xi'an Rail Transit Group Company Limited, Xi'an 710018, Shaanxi, China)
Keywords:
urban rail transit passenger flow prediction coupled spatial-temporal characteristic back propagation neural network particle swarm optimization algorithm adaptive mutation inertia weight
PACS:
U293.13
DOI:
10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.04.016
Abstract:
To improve the accuracy of subway passenger flow prediction, by considering the Xi'an Metro Line 1 as an example, five main factors affecting subway passenger flow variations, such as festival, non-festival, time period, station, and weather, were extracted to analyze the coupled spatial-temporal characteristics of subway passenger flow. A back propagation(BP)neural network was constructed to predict the subway passenger flow. The proposed BP neural network was further optimized by using a particle swarm optimization(PSO)algorithm that introduced adaptive mutation and balanced inertia weights to form a subway passenger flow prediction system that could consider complex influence factors. Transfer stations and non-transfer stations including a first and an intermediate station were selected, the weather, festival, and non-festival factors were considered, and the BP neural network models for different time periods were compared. Then, the prediction errors of the PSO-BP neural network model were optimized. Research results show that by considering the weather, festival and non-festival factors, the mean absolute error(MAE), root mean square error(RMSE), and mean absolute percentage error(MAPE)of the optimized PSO-BP neural network model predictions at transfer stations within the optimized time periods decrease by 40.13%, 31.46% and 23.89%, respectively, compared with the optimized PSO-BP neural network models prediction errors without the time periods, decrease by 17.50%, 17.86% and 17.32% compared with the BP neural network models prediction errors within the optimized time periods. The MAE, RMSE, and MAPE of the optimized PSO-BP neural network model predictions in the non-transfer stations within the optimized time periods decrease by 16.50%, 20.99% and 32.59%, respectively, compared with the optimized PSO-BP neural network model prediction errors without time periods, and decrease by 11.48%, 12.10% and 17.73%, respectively, compared with the BP neural network model prediction errors within the optimized time periods. The MAE, RMSE, and MAPE of the optimized PSO-BP neural network model predictions at each station within the optimized time periods decrease by 24.37%, 24.48% and 29.69%, respectively, compared with the optimized PSO-BP neural network model prediction errors without time periods, and decrease by 13.49%, 14.02% and 17.59%, respectively, compared with the BP neural network model prediction errors within the given time periods. Therefore, using the optimized PSO-BP neural network model and considering the influencing factors can improve the accuracy of subway passenger flow prediction. 8 tabs, 12 figs, 30 refs.

References:

[1] LU Jia, REN Gang, XU Ling-hui. Analysis of subway
station distribution capacity based on automatic fare collection data of Nanjing Metro[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A: Systems, 2020, 146(2): 04019067.
[2] KALKSTEIN A J, KUBY M, GERRITY D, et al. An analysis of air mass effects on rail ridership in three US cities[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2009, 17(3): 198-207.
[3] LIU Cheng-xi, SUSILO Y O, KARLSTRÖM A. Investigating the impacts of weather variability on individual's daily activity-travel patterns: a comparison between commuters and non-commuters in Sweden[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 82: 47-64.
[4] GUO Yong-qing, WANG Xiao-yuan, XU Qing, et al.
Weather impact on passenger flow of rail transit lines[J]. Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, 6(2): 276-284.
[5] PEREIRA F C, RODRIGUES F, BEN-AKIVA M. Using data from the web to predict public transport arrivals under special events scenarios[J]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2015, 19(3): 273-288.
[6] WANG Hai-yang, LI Long-yuan, PAN Ping-jun, et al.
Early warning of burst passenger flow in public transportation system[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2019, 105: 580-598.
[7] JUN M J, CHOI K, JEONG J E, et al. Land use
characteristics of subway catchment areas and their influence on subway ridership in Seoul[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2015, 48: 30-40.
[8] ZHANG Jian, GUO Wei-hao. Research on railway passenger flow prediction method based on GA improved BP neural network[J]. Journal of Computer and Communications, 2019, 7(7): 283-292.
[9] 梅妍玭,张得才,傅 荣.一种准确预测船舶交通流的自适应遗传算法优化的BP神经网络模型研究[J].电子器件,2020,43(2):452-455.
MEI Yan-pin, ZHANG De-cai, FU Rong. A BP neural network model for adaptive genetic algorithm optimization for predicting ship traffic flow[J]. Chinese Journal of Electron Devices, 2020, 43(2): 452-455.(in Chinese)
[10] 秦琪怡,郭承湘,吴 帅,等.基于粒子群和布谷鸟搜索的BP神经网络优化方法研究[J].广西大学学报(自然科学版),2020,45(4):898-905.
QIN Qi-yi, GUO Cheng-xiang, WU Shuai, et al. On BP neural network optimization based on particle swarm optimization and cuckoo search fusion[J]. Journal of Guangxi University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 45(4): 898-905.(in Chinese)
[11] LYU Yong-yang, LIU Wen-ju, WANG Ze, et al. WSN localization technology based on hybrid GA-PSO-BP algorithm for indoor three-dimensional space[J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2020, 114(1): 167-184.
[12] XU Xin-yue, LI Hai-ying, LIU Jun, et al. Passenger flow control with multi-station coordination in subway networks: algorithm development and real-world case study[J]. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, 2019, 7(1): 446-472.
[13] 毛焕宇,王文东.融合隶属度函数的自适应惯性权重模式的粒子群优化算法[J].计算机应用与软件,2020,37(1):277-283.
MAO Huan-yu, WANG Wen-dong. Particle swarm optimization based on adaptive inertia weight model with membership function[J]. Computer Applications and Software, 2020, 37(1): 277-283.(in Chinese)
[14] CHEN Hai-tao, WANG Wen-chuan, CHEN Xiao-nan, et al. Multi-objective reservoir operation using particle swarm optimization with adaptive random inertia weights[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2020, 13(2): 136-144.
[15] 尹 芹,孟 斌,张丽英.基于客流特征的北京地铁站点类型识别[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(1):126-134.
YIN Qin, MENG Bin, ZHANG Li-ying. Classification of subway stations in Beijing based on passenger flow characteristics[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(1): 126-134.
[16] 马超群,张 爽,陈 权,等.客流特征视角下的轨道交通网络特征及其脆弱性[J].交通运输工程学报,2020,20(5):208-216.
MA Chao-qun, ZHANG Shuang, CHEN Quan, et al. Characteristics and vulnerability of rail transit network from the perspective of passenger flow characteristics[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(5): 208-216.(in Chinese)
[17] 赵阳阳,夏 亮,江欣国.基于经验模态分解与长短时记忆神经网络的短时地铁客流预测模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2020,20(4):194-204.
ZHAO Yang-yang, XIA Liang, JIANG Xin-guo. Short-term metro passenger flow prediction based on EMD-LSTM[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(4): 194-204.(in Chinese)
[18] ZHANG Wen-yao, WEI Zong-wen, WANG Bing-hong, et al. Measuring mixing patterns in complex networks by Spearman rank correlation coefficient[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2016, 451: 440-450.
[19] 胡 伟.改进的层次K均值聚类算法[J].计算机工程与应用,2013,49(2):157-159.
HU Wei. Improved hierarchical K-means clustering algorithm[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2013, 49(2): 157-159.(in Chinese)
[20] 杨辉华,王 克,李灵巧,等.基于自适应布谷鸟搜索算法的K-means聚类算法及其应用[J].计算机应用,2016,36(8):2066-2070.
YANG Hui-hua, WANG Ke, LI Ling-qiao, et al. K-means clustering algorithm based on adaptive cuckoo search and its application[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2016, 36(8): 2066-2070.(in Chinese)
[21] MORIN L, GILORMINI P, DERRIEN K. Generalized Euclidean distances for elasticity tensors[J]. Journal of Elasticity, 2020, 138(2): 221-232.
[22] WANG Wen-wu, CICHOCKI A, CHAMBERS J A. A
multiplicative algorithm for convolutive non-negative matrix factorization based on squared Euclidean distance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2009, 57(7): 2858-2864.
[23] KLØVE T, LIN T T, TSAI S C, et al. Permutation arrays under the Chebyshev distance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2010, 56(6): 2611-2617.
[24] 苏崇宇,汪毓铎.基于改进的自适应遗传算法优化BP神经网络[J].工业控制计算机,2019,32(1):67-69.
SU Chong-yu, WANG Yu-duo. BP neural network optimized by improved adaptive genetic algorithm computer engineering and applications[J]. Industrial Control Computer, 2019, 32(1): 67-69.(in Chinese)
[25] 龚麒鉴,郭亚宾,陈焕新,等.基于粒子群优化算法和BP神经网络的变频压缩机功率预测[J].制冷学报,2020,41(1):89-95.
GONG Qi-jian, GUO Ya-bin, CHEN Huan-xin, et al. Prediction of variable-speed compressor power based on particle swarm optimization and back propagation neural network[J]. Journal of Refrigeration, 2020, 41(1): 89-95.(in Chinese)
[26] YANG Liu, CHEN Han-xin. Fault diagnosis of gearbox
based on RBF-PF and particle swarm optimization wavelet neural network[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2019, 31(9): 4463-4478.
[27] HU Yu-sha, LI Ji-geng, HONG Men-na, et al. Short term electric load forecasting model and its verification for process industrial enterprises based on hybrid GA-PSO-BPNN algorithm—a case study of papermaking process[J]. Energy, 2019, 170: 1215-1227.
[28] KHAIR U, FAHMI H, AL HAKIM S, et al. Forecasting
error calculation with mean absolute deviation and mean absolute percentage error[C]∥IOP. Journal of Physics Conference Series. Bristol: IOP, 2017: 012002.
[29] PISHDAD L, LABEAU F. Analytic minimum mean-square error bounds in linear dynamic systems with gaussian mixture noise statistics[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 67990-67999.
[30] WAGNER K, DOROSLOVAACGKI M. Proportionate-type
normalized least mean square algorithms with gain allocation motivated by mean-square-error minimization for white input[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2011, 59(5): 2410-2415.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-09-01