|Table of Contents|

Comparison of vertical vortex-induced vibration characteristics between semi-open girder and separated edge-boxes open girder(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2021年04期
Page:
130-138
Research Field:
道路与铁道工程
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparison of vertical vortex-induced vibration characteristics between semi-open girder and separated edge-boxes open girder
Author(s):
DUAN Qing-song1; 2;  MA Cun-ming2
(1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010,Sichuan, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China)
Keywords:
bridge engineering;  vortex-induced vibration;  wind tunnel test;  numerical simulation;  semi-open girder;  separated edge-boxes open girder
PACS:
U441.3
DOI:
10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.04.009
Abstract:
Wind tunnel tests on sectional models with a scale ratio of 1:50 were performed to comprehensively investigate the vortex-induced vibration characteristics and associated mechanisms of open girders with different cross sections. The vortex-induced vibration characteristics of semi-open girder and separated edge-boxes open girder were analyzed and compared. The influence factors, including the equivalent mass, wind attack angle, and damping ratio, were considered. In addition, the Strouhal numbers of the two girder cross sections were computed. Based on the linear and nonlinear theories, the vertical vortex-induced vibration amplitudes of real bridge girders were calculated. A two-dimensional numerical simulation model was established, and the accuracy of the numerical simulation method was verified. Then, the instantaneous vorticity contours and mean streamline structures around the two girder cross sections were compared. Analysis results show that at the wind attack angles of 3° and 5°, the vortex-induced vibration is observed for both girders, and there are two vortex-induced vibration regions. The maximum amplitude in the second vertical vortex-induced vibration region is significantly larger than that in the first one. The vertical vortex-induced vibration amplitude at an wind attack angle of 5° is 75% larger than that at an wind attack angle of 3°. When the wind attack angle is 5° and damping ratio is 0.8%, the maximum vertical vortex-induced vibration amplitude of separated edge-boxes open girder is 28% larger than that of the semi-open girder. The maximum vertical vortex-induced vibration amplitude decreases almost linearly as the Scruton number increases. For the same Scruton number, the vertical vortex-induced vibration amplitude of separated edge-boxes open girder peaks at a wind attack angle of 5°, whereas the vertical vortex-induced vibration amplitude of semi-open girder is at its minimum at a wind attack angle of 3°, indicating that the larger the positive wind attack angle, the blunter the cross section of the girder, and the worse the vortex-induced vibration characteristics. When the wind attack angle equals 5°, the separated edge-boxes open girder is blunter, causing increased air fluid separation. There are vortexes above the girder deck and at the openings of the girder formed by the incoming wind, the inclined web and wind fairing may break the large vortexes at the openings into several smaller vortexes with similar sizes, thus optimizing the vortex-induced vibration of girders. 3 tabs, 9 figs, 31 refs.

References:

[1] 聂建国,陶慕轩,吴丽丽,等.钢-混凝土组合结构桥梁研究新进展[J].土木工程学报,2012,45(6):110-122.
NIE Jian-guo, TAO Mu-xuan, WU Li-li, et al. Advances of research on steel-concrete composite bridges[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(6): 110-122.(in Chinese)
[2] 陈宝春,牟廷敏,陈宜言,等.我国钢-混凝土组合结构桥梁研究进展及工程应用[J].建筑结构学报,2013,34(增1):1-10.
CHEN Bao-chun, MU Ting-min, CHEN Yi-yan, et al. State-of-the-art of research and engineering application of steel-concrete composite bridges in China[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(S1): 1-10.(in Chinese)
[3] 葛耀君,赵 林,许 坤.大跨度桥梁主梁涡激振动研究进展与思考 [J].中国公路学报,2019,32(10):1-18.
GE Yao-jun, ZHAO Lin, XU Kun. Review and reflection on vortex-induced vibration of main girders of long-span bridges[J]. China Journal of Highway Transport, 2019, 32(10): 1-18.(in Chinese)
[4] 金 挺,林志兴.扁平箱形桥梁断面斯托罗哈数的雷诺数效应研究 [J].工程力学,2006,23(10):174-179.
JIN Ting, LIN Zhi-xing. Reynolds number effects on Strouhal number of flat-box girder bridge decks[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2006, 23(10): 174-179.(in Chinese)
[5] LARSEN A, ESDAHL S, ANDERSEN J, et al. Storebelt Suspension Bridge—vortex shedding excitation and mitigation by guide vanes[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2000, 88(2): 283-296.
[6] FUJINO Y,YOSHIDA Y. Wind-induced vibration and control of Trans-Tokyo Bay Crossing Bridge[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2002, 128(8): 1012-1025.
[7] BELLOI M, FOSSATI F, GIAPPINO S, et al. Vortex induced vibrations of a bridge deck: dynamic response and surface pressure distribution[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2014, 133(10): 160-168.
[8] MA Cun-ming, WANG Jun-xin, LI Qiu-sheng, et al.
Vortex-induced vibration performance and suppression mechanism for a long suspension bridge with wide twin-box girder[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2018, 144(11): 04018202.
[9] WU Teng, KAREEM A. Vortex-induced vibration of bridge decks: Volterra series-based model[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 139(12): 1831-1843.
[10] YANG Yong-xin, ZHOU Rui, GE Yao-jun, et al. Experimental studies on VIV performance and countermeasures for twin-box girder bridges with various slot width ratios[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2016, 66: 476-489.
[11] 李加武,王 新,张 悦,等.桥梁风致振动的混沌特性[J].交通运输工程学报,2014,14(3):34-42.
LI Jia-wu, WANG Xin, ZHANG Yue, et al. Chaos characteristics of wind-induced vibrations for bridge[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2014, 14(3): 34-42.(in Chinese)
[12] KUBO Y, KIMURA K, SADASHIMA K, et al. Aerodynamic performance of improved shallow π shape bridge deck[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2002, 90(12/13/14/15): 2113-2125.
[13] IRWIN P A. Bluff body aerodynamics in wind engineering[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96(6): 701-712.
[14] 朱乐东,张 海,张宏杰.多孔扰流板对半封闭窄箱梁涡振的减振效果[J].实验流体力学,2012,26(3):50-55
ZHU Le-dong, ZHANG Hai, ZHANG Hong-jie. Mitigation effect of multi-orifice flow-distributing plate on vortex-induced resonance of narrow semi-closed box deck[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 26(3): 50-55.(in Chinese)
[15] 张志田,卿前志,肖 玮,等.开口截面斜拉桥涡激共振风洞试验及减振措施研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2011,38(7):1-5.
ZHANG Zhi-tian, QING Qian-zhi, XIAO Wei, et al. Vortex-induced vibration and control method for a cable-stayed bridge with open cross section[J]. Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences), 2011, 38(7): 1-5.(in Chinese)
[16] 汪至雄,张志田,郄 凯,等.Π型开口截面斜拉桥弯扭耦合涡激共振及气动减振措施研究[J].振动与冲击,2021,40(1):52-57.
WANG Zhi-xiong, ZHANG Zhi-tian, QIE Kai, et al. Bending-torsion coupled vortex induced resonance of π-type open section cable stayed bridge and aerodynamic vibration reduction measures[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(1): 52-57.(in Chinese)
[17] 钱国伟,曹丰产,葛耀君.Π型叠合梁斜拉桥涡振性能及气动控制措施研究[J].振动与冲击,2015,34(2):176-181.
QIAN Guo-wei, CAO Feng-chan, GE Yao-jun. Vortex-induced vibration performance of a cable-stayed bridge with Π shaped composite deck and its aerodynamic control measurements[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(2): 176-181.(in Chinese)
[18] 孟晓亮,郭震山,丁泉顺,等.风嘴角度对封闭和半封闭箱梁涡振及颤振性能的影响[J].工程力学,2011,28(增1):184-188,194.
MENG Xiao-liang, GUO Zhen-shan, DING Quan-shun, et al. Influence of wind fairing angle on vortex-induced vibrations and flutter performances of closed and semi-closed box decks[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(S1): 184-188, 194.(in Chinese)
[19] 战庆亮,周志勇,葛耀君.开口叠合梁断面气动性能的试验研究[J].桥梁建设,2017,47(1):17-22
ZHAN Qing-liang, ZHOU Zhi-yong, GE Yao-jun. Experimental study of aerodynamic performance of open cross sections of composite girders[J]. Bridge Construction, 2017, 47(1): 17-22.(in Chinese)
[20] 段青松,马存明.边箱叠合梁涡振性能及抑振措施研究[J].桥梁建设,2017,47(5):30-35
DUAN Qing-song, MA Cun-ming. Study of vortex-induced vibration performance and vibration suppression measures for composite girder with edge boxes[J]. Bridge Construction, 2017, 47(5): 30-35.(in Chinese)
[21] 方根深,杨詠昕,葛耀君,等.半开口分离双箱梁涡振性能及其气动控制措施研究[J].土木工程学报,2017,50(3):74-82.
FANG Gen-shen, YANG Yong-xin, GE Yao-jun, et al. Vortex-induced vibration performance and aerodynamic countermeasures of semi-open separated twin-box deck[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, 50(3): 74-82.(in Chinese)
[22] WANG Jun-xin, MA Cun-ming, LI Ming-shui, et al.
Experimental and numerical studies of the vortex-induced vibration behavior of an asymmetrical composite beam[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2019, 22(10): 2236-2249.
[23] MA Cun-ming, DUAN Qing-song, LIAO Hai-li. Experimental investigation on aerodynamic behavior of a long span cable-stayed bridge under construction[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(7): 2492-2501.
[24] 杨咏漪,陈克坚,李明水,等.韩家沱长江大桥高低雷诺数涡激共振试验研究[J].桥梁建设,2015,45(3):76-81
YANG Yong-yi, CHEN Ke-jian, LI Ming-shui, et al. Test study of vortex-induced vibration of Hanjiatuo Changjiang River Bridge at high and low Reynolds numbers[J]. Bridge Construction, 2015, 45(3): 76-81.(in Chinese)
[25] MATSUMOTO M. Vortex shedding of bluff bodies: a
review[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 1999, 13(7/8): 791-811.
[26] 张志田,陈政清.桥梁节段与实桥涡激共振幅值的换算关系[J].土木工程学报,2011,44(7):77-82.
ZHANG Zhi-tian, CHEN Zheng-qing. Similarity of amplitude of sectional model to that of full bridge in the case of vortex-induced resonance[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(7): 77-82.(in Chinese)
[27] 周 帅,陈政清,华旭刚,等.大跨度桥梁高阶涡振幅值对比风洞试验研究[J].振动与冲击,2017,36(18):29-35,69.
ZHOU Shuai, CHEN Zheng-qing, HUA Xu-gang, et al. Wind tunnel experimental research on high-mode vortex-induced vibration for large span bridges[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(18): 29-35, 69.(in Chinese)
[28] 李明水,孙延国,廖海黎.基于涡激力偏相关的大跨度桥梁涡激共振线性分析方法[J].空气动力学报,2012,30(5):675-679.
LI Ming-shui, SUN Yan-guo, LIAO Hai-li. A linear approach of vortex induced vibration for long span bridges based on partial correlation of aerodynamic force[J]. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica, 2012, 30(5): 675-679.(in Chinese)
[29] 朱乐东.桥梁涡激共振试验节段模型质量系统模拟与振幅修正方法 [J].工程力学,2005,10(5):204-208.
ZHU Le-dong. Mass simulation and amplitude conversation of bridge sectional model test for vortex-induced resonance[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2005, 10(5): 204-208.(in Chinese)
[30] 黄 俐,周 帅,梁 鹏.桥梁断面两个涡振锁定区间的数值模拟研究[J].振动与冲击,2016,35(11):47-53.
HUANG Li, ZHOU Shuai, LIANG Peng. Number simulation for two separate vortex-induced vibration lock-in intervals of bridge sections[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 35(11): 47-53.(in Chinese)
[31] 刘海涛.y+值对MIRA模型气动参数计算精度的影响[J].交通运输工程学报,2019,19(4):125-136.
LIU Hai-tao. Influence of y+ value on calculation accuracy of aerodynamic parameters of MIRA model[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(4): 125-136.(in Chinese)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-09-01