|Table of Contents|

Cell transmission model of mixed traffic flow of manual-automated driving(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2020年02期
Page:
229-238
Research Field:
交通信息工程及控制
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Cell transmission model of mixed traffic flow of manual-automated driving
Author(s):
QIN Yan-yan1 ZHANG Jian2 CHEN Ling-zhi1 LI Shu-qing1 HE Zhao-yi1 RAN Bin3
(1. School of Traffic and Transportation, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 2. School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, China; 3. Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison WI 53706, Wisconsin, USA)
Keywords:
traffic flow cell transmission model automated driving moving bottleneck influence time
PACS:
U491.112
DOI:
10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2020.02.019
Abstract:
In order to analyze the impacts of automated driving vehicles on the macroscopic traffic flow characteristics, the mixed traffic flow with manual driving vehicles and automated driving vehicles was considered as the study objective, and the cell transmission model(CTM)of mixed traffic flow under different proportions of automated driving vehicles was proposed.The car-following model proposed by Newell was used for the car-following model of manual driving vehicles, while the model calibrated by PATH program used the real vehicle experiments was employed for the car-following model of automated driving vehicles.The function relation of equilibrium space headway-speed was calculated according to the car-following models of manual and automated driving vehicles.The fundamental diagram model of mixed traffic flow was derived under different proportions of automated driving vehicles. In addition, the characteristic quantities such as the maximum capacity, the maximum jam density, and backward wave speed were calculated for the mixed traffic flow under different proportions of automated driving vehicles. Based on the CTM theory of homogenous traffic flow, the CTM of mixed traffic flow was proposed under different proportions of automated driving vehicles. The moving bottleneck problem was selected for example analysis, the influence times of moving bottleneck under different proportions of automated driving vehicles were calculated by using the mixed traffic flow CTM. The car-following models were used for the microcosmic numerical simulation on the moving bottleneck problem. The errors between the calculation results of the mixed traffic flow CTM and the microcosmic simulation results of car-following models were analyzed. The accuracy of mixed traffic flow CTM was validated. Research result shows that the proposed mixed traffic flow CTM can effectively calculate the influence time of moving bottleneck. Under different proportions of automated driving vehicles, the errors between the calculation results of the mixed traffic flow CTM and the microcosmic simulation results of car-following models are all below 52 s, and the relative errors are all below 10%, which indicates the accuracy of the proposed mixed traffic flow CTM in actual application. The mixed traffic flow CTM reflects the study idea from microcosmic to macroscopic. There are relationships between the microcosmic car-following models and the small-scale automated driving vehicle experiments being gradually implemented. The mixed traffic flow CTM can truthfully reflect the evolutionary process of mixed traffic flow on single lane in the background of automated driving under different proportions in the future, which enhances the application value of the model research. 3 tabs, 5 figs, 31 refs.

References:

[1] 《中国公路学报》编辑部.中国交通工程学术研究综述·2016[J].中国公路学报,2016,29(6):1-161.
Editorial Department of China Journal of Highway and Transport. Review on China's traffic engineering research progress: 2016[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2016, 29(6): 1-161.(in Chinese)
[2] 秦严严,王 昊,王 炜,等.自适应巡航控制车辆跟驰模型综述[J].交通运输工程学报,2017,17(3):121-130.
QIN Yan-yan, WANG Hao, WANG Wei, et al. Review of car-following models of adaptive cruise control[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17(3): 121-130.(in Chinese)
[3] WANG Ren, LI Yan-ning, WORK D B. Comparing traffic state estimators for mixed human and automated traffic flows[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2017, 78: 95-110.
[4] KESTING A, TREIBER M, SCHONHOF M, et al. Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2008, 16(6): 668-683.
[5] SHLADOVER S, SU Dong-yan, LU Xiao-yun. Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2012(2324): 63-70.
[6] GONG Si-yuan, SHEN Jing-lai, DU Li-li. Constrained optimization and distributed computation based car following control of a connected and autonomous vehicle platoon[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2016, 94: 314-334.
[7] JIA Dong-yao, NGODUY D. Platoon based cooperative driving model with consideration of realistic inter-vehicle communication[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2016, 68: 245-264.
[8] JIA Dong-yao, NGODUY D. Enhanced cooperative car-
following traffic model with the combination of V2V and V2I communication[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2016, 90: 172-191.
[9] SU Peng, MA Jia-qi, LOCHRANE T W P, et al. The integrated adaptive cruise control car-following model based on trajectory data[C]∥TRB. Proceedings of the 95rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington DC: TRB, 2016: 1-17.
[10] PLOEG J, SEMSAR-KAZEROONI E, LIJSTER G, et al.
Graceful degradation of cooperative adaptive cruise control[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2015, 16(1): 488-497.
[11] MILANES V, SHLADOVER S E, SPRING J, et al.
Cooperative adaptive cruise control in real traffic situations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014, 15(1): 296-305.
[12] MILANES V, SHLADOVER S E. Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2014, 48: 285-300.
[13] HOOGENDOORN R, VAN AREM B, HOOGENDOORN S. Automated driving, traffic flow efficiency, and human factors: literature review[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2014(2422): 113-120.
[14] HOOGENDOORN S P, BOVY P H L. Continuum modeling of multiclass traffic flow[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2000, 34(2): 123-146.
[15] NGODUY D. Platoon-based macroscopic model for intelligent traffic flow[J]. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, 2013, 1(2): 153-169.
[16] JIN Wen-Long. On the equivalence between continuum and car-following models of traffic flow[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2016, 93: 543-559.
[17] 秦严严,王 昊,王 炜,等.混有CACC车辆和ACC车辆的异质交通流基本图模型[J].中国公路学报,2017,30(10):127-136.
QIN Yan-yan, WANG Hao, WANG Wei, et al. Fundamental diagram of heterogeneous traffic flow mixed with cooperative adaptive cruise control vehicles and adaptive cruise control vehicles[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(10): 127-136.(in Chinese)
[18] 秦严严,王 昊,王 炜.智能网联环境下的混合交通流LWR模型[J].中国公路学报,2018,31(11):147-156.
QIN Yan-yan, WANG Hao, WANG Wei. LWR model for mixed traffic flow in connected and autonomous vehicular environments [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(11): 147-156.(in Chinese)
[19] DAGANZO C F. The cell transmission model: a dynamic
representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1994, 28(4): 269-287.
[20] LEVIN M W, BOYLES S D. A multiclass cell transmission model for shared human and autonomous vehicle roads[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2016, 62: 103-116.
[21] QIN Yan-yan, WANG Hao. Cell transmission model for mixed traffic flow with connected and autonomous vehicles[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 2019, 145(5): 04019014-1-8.
[22] TIAPRASERT K, ZHANG Yun-long, ASWAKUL C, et al. Closed-form multiclass cell transmission model enhanced with overtaking, lane-changing, and first-in first-out properties[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2017, 85: 86-110.
[23] NEWELL G F. A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2002, 36(3): 195-205.
[24] 王殿海,金 盛.车辆跟驰行为建模的回顾与展望[J].中国公路学报,2012,25(1):115-127.
WANG Dian-hai, JIN Sheng. Review and outlook of modeling of car following behavior[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2012, 25(1): 115-127.(in Chinese)
[25] TREIBER M, HENNECKE A, HELBING D. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations[J]. Physical Review E, 2000, 62(2): 1805-1824.
[26] JIANG Rui, WU Qing-song, ZHU Zuo-jin. Full velocity
difference model for a car-following theory[J]. Physical Review E, 2001, 64: 017101-1-4.
[27] BANDO M, HASEBE K, NAKAYAMA A, et al. Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation[J]. Physical Review E, 1995, 51(2): 1035-1042.
[28] BRACKSTONE M, MCDONALD M. Car-following: a historical review[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 1999, 2: 181-196.
[29] ZHANG H M, KIM T. A car-following theory for multiphase vehicular traffic flow[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2005, 39: 385-399.
[30] AHN S, CASSIDY M J, LAVAL J. Verification of a simplified car-following theory[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2004, 38(5): 431-440.
[31] NI Dai-heng, LEONARD J D, JIA Chao-qun, et al. Vehicle longitudinal control and traffic stream modeling[J]. Transportation Science, 2015, 50(3): 1016-1031.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-05-22