|Table of Contents|

Partition model of road traffic accident influence area based on density entropy(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2019年06期
Page:
163-170
Research Field:
交通运输规划与管理
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Partition model of road traffic accident influence area based on density entropy
Author(s):
LIU Wei1 CHEN Ke-quan12 TIAN Zong-zhong3 PENG Bo1
(1. College of Traffic and Transportation, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 2. School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, China; 3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno 89557, Nevada, USA)
Keywords:
traffic safety traffic accident cluster analysis accident range partition dissipative theory cascading failure
PACS:
U491.31
DOI:
10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2019.06.015
Abstract:
The initial load of network was identified based on the dynamic effect of path impedance. The duration of accident was considered as parameter, and the network load re-distribution was introduced based on the prospect theory. The dissipative structure model was established by the entropy of traffic flow density, and the change rate of traffic flow density entropy of each road was determined by combined with the load distribution process. The partition model of traffic accident influence area was established based on cluster analysis. The influence of partition was analyzed by simulation experiment under different initial loads and accident durations. Simulation result shows that when the traffic base is 800 pcu·h-1 and the accident duration changes from 20 min to 30 min, the number of directed road sections in direct impact area increases from 3 to 6, and the number of directed road sections in indirect impact area increases from 5 to 18, indicating that the entropy of road section affected by accident is on an upward trend and the cascading failure of road network is not obvious. When the traffic base rises to 1 000 pcu·h-1 and the accident duration changes from 20 min to 30 min, the number of directed road sections in direct impact area increases from 8 to 19, and the number of directed road sections in indirect impact area increases from 16 to 21, indicating that the effect is concentrated on the direct impact area. Therefore, the influence degree of each directed road section affected by accident is obviously different under different traffic situations. With the increases of accident duration and initial traffic flow, the influence degree of accident on directed road sections increases. Therefore, the partition of traffic accident influence area can precisely describe the dynamic evolution process of road traffic performance. 3 tabs, 6 figs, 30 refs.

References:

[1] AMIRGHOLY M, GAO H O. Modeling the dynamics of
congestion in large urban networks using the macroscopic fundamental diagram: user equilibrium, system optimum, and pricing strategies[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2017, 104: 215-237.
[2] KNOOP V L, VAN LINT H, HOOGENDOORN S P.
Traffic dynamics: its impact on the macroscopic fundamental diagram[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2015, 438: 236-250.
[3] KEYVAN-EKBATANI M, PAPAGEORGIOU M, PAPAMICHAIL I. Urban congestion gating control based on reduced operational network fundamental diagrams[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2013, 33: 74-87.
[4] YILDIRIMOGLU M, GEROLIMINIS N. Approximating dynamic equilibrium conditions with macroscopic fundamental diagrams[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2014, 70: 186-200.
[5] MAHMASSANI H S, SABERI M, ZOCKAIE A.Urban
network gridlock: theory, characteristics, and dynamics[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2013, 36: 480-497.
[6] KERNER B S.Criticism of generally accepted fundamentals and methodologies of traffic and transportation theory: a brief review[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2013, 392(21): 5261-5282.
[7] WANG Yu-qi, CAO Jian-nong, LI Wen-gen, et al. Exploring traffic congestion correlation from multiple data sources[J]. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2017, 41: 470-483.
[8] YANG Su. On feature selection for traffic congestion prediction[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2013, 26: 160-169.
[9] KONG Xiang-jie, XU Zhen-zhen, SHEN Guo-jiang, et al. Urban traffic congestion estimation and prediction based on floating car trajectory data[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2016, 61: 97-107.
[10] HE Fei-fei, YAN Xue-dong, LIU Yang, et al. A traffic
congestion assessment method for urban road networks based on speed performance index[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 137: 425-433.
[11] TIAN Jun-fang, TREIBER M, MA Shou-feng, et al. Microscopic driving theory with oscillatory congested states: model and empirical verification[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2015, 71: 138-157.
[12] TIAN Jun-fang, LI Guang-yu, TREIBER M, et al. Cellular
automaton model simulating spatiotemporal patterns, phase transitions and concave growth pattern of oscillations in traffic flow[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2016, 93: 560-575.
[13] CHUNG Y, RECKER W W. A methodological approach for estimating temporal and spatial extent of delays caused by freeway accidents[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2012, 13(3): 1454-1461.
[14] CHUNG Y, RECKER W W. Frailty models for the estimation of spatiotemporally maximum congested impact information on freeway accidents[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2015, 16(4): 2104-2112.
[15] WANG Zheng-li, QI Xin, JIANG Hai. Estimating the
spatiotemporal impact of traffic incidents: an integer programming approach consistent with the propagation of shockwaves[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2018, 111: 356-369.
[16] MARSHALL W E, GARRICK N W. Does street network
design affect traffic safety?[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2011, 43(3): 769-781.
[17] ZHANG Yuan-yuan, BIGHAM J, RAGLAND D, et al.
Investigating the associations between road network structure and non-motorist accidents[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2015, 42: 34-47.
[18] SUN Chen-shuo, PEI Xin, HAO Jun-heng, et al. Role of road network features in the evaluation of incident impacts on urban traffic mobility[J]. Transportation Research part B: Methodological, 2018, 117: 101-116.
[19] MFINANGA D, FUNGO E. Impact of incidents on traffic
congestion in Dares Salaam City[J]. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 2013, 2(2): 95-108.
[20] HOJATI A T, FERREIRA L, WASHINGTON S, et al. Modelling the impact of traffic incidents on travel time reliability[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2016, 65: 49-60.
[21] KADDOURA I, NAGEL K. Using real-world traffic incident data in transport modeling[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2018, 130: 880-885.
[22] 刘 伟,陈科全,刘玉印,等.前景理论下道路网络的级联失效演变[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2018,18(1):145-151.
LIU Wei, CHEN Ke-quan, LIU Yu-yin, et al. Cascading failure simulation of road network based on prospect theory[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(1): 145-151.(in Chinese)
[23] 马壮林,邵春福,胡大伟,等.高速公路交通事故起数时空分析模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2012,12(2):93-99.
MA Zhuang-lin, SHAO Chun-fu, HU Da-wei, et al. Temporal-spatial analysis model of traffic accident frequency on expressway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12(2): 93-99.(in Chinese)
[24] 金书鑫,王建军,徐嫚谷.区域高速路网交通事故影响区划分及交通诱导[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2017,37(2):89-98.
JIN Shu-xin, WANG Jian-jun, XU Man-gu. Traffic accident affected zone division and traffic guidance under regional highway network[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 37(2): 89-98.(in Chinese)
[25] 肖恢翚,陆 建,邱红桐,等.城市快速路交通事件影响范围预测模型[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2016,48(9):54-59.
XIAO Hui-hui, LU Jian, QIU Hong-tong, et al. The range forecast model of traffic incidents impact on urban expressway[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016, 48(9): 54-59.(in Chinese)
[26] 王正武,陈小兰,李常乐.道路交通网络级联失效影响源辨识[J].中国公路学报,2015,28(10):98-104.
WANG Zheng-wu, CHEN Xiao-lan, LI Chang-le. Identifying influence sources of cascading failure for road traffic network[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2015, 28(10): 98-104.
[27] 任小聪,向红艳,陈 坚.交通事故信息对路径选择行为的影响建模与分析[J].公路交通科技,2016,33(7):103-107,113.
REN Xiao-cong, XIANG Hong-yan, CHEN Jian. Modeling and analysis of influence of traffic accident information on route choice behavior[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 33(7): 103-107, 113.(in Chinese)
[28] TVERSKY A, KAHEMAN D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5: 297-323.
[29] 莫祥伦.城市道路交通流自组织运行机理及控制研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2014.
MO Xiang-lun. Study on operation mechanism and control of self-organization traffic flow in urban road net[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2014.(in Chinese)
[30] 石小法,王 炜,杨东援.信息对出行者出行行为的影响研究[J].中国公路学报,2002,15(1):89-92.
SHI Xiao-fa, WANG Wei, YANG Dong-yuan. Bounded-rational travel behavior under traffic incident[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2002, 15(1): 89-92.(in Chinese)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-01-13