|Table of Contents|

Mechanical performance of jointless retrofitted bridge with hollow-slabs(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2018年05期
Page:
66-76
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Mechanical performance of jointless retrofitted bridge with hollow-slabs
Author(s):
XU Zhen1; 2;  CHEN Bao-chun1;  HUANG Fu-yun1;  ZHUANG Yi-zhou1;  HUANG Qing-wei1
(1. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, Jiangsu, China)
Keywords:
bridge engineering;  simply supported bridge;  hollow slab;  jointless retrofitting;  deck-extension;  field test;  finite element model;  support;  approach slab;  pavement
PACS:
U448.212
DOI:
-
Abstract:
A multi-span bridge with hollow-slabs was retrofitted into a jointless bridge, in which the simple support slabs were converted into the continuous slabs with double row supports and the general abutments were converted into deck-extension abutments, thus, all movable deck joints of the bridge were eliminated. The static and dynamic load tests of jointless retrofitted bridge with multi-span hollow-slabs were carried out, and the mechanical performance of the bridge was studied. The finite element model was used to calculate the structural mechanical performance, bearing capacity and mechanical performance of approach slab, and to analyze the influence of single and double rows supports on the structural mechanical performance. Test result shows that after jointless retrofitting, the tested fundamental frequency of the bridge is 8.60 Hz and larger than 5.37 Hz before jointless retrofitting. The maximum tested impact factor is 1.11 of four vehicle speeds and smaller than 1.36 that is the calculated value by the General Specifications for Design of Highway Bridges and Culverts(JTG D60—2004). The verification coefficients of the strain and deflection are less than 0.95. Obviously, the jointless retrofitting enhances the integrality of the bridge and improves the driving comfortability. The finite element analysis result shows that after jointless retrofitting, the fundamental frequency of the bridge is 8.48 Hz, and the ratio is 1.01 between the tested fundamental frequency and calculated result, so the bridge is in good working condition. The positive bending moments of mid-span sections reduce significantly with a maximum value of 15.6% at the second span, while the negative bending moments appear at the inner-supports and the shear forces near the inner-supports increase with a maximum value of 18.2%. The mid-span deflections decrease obviously with a maximum value of 35.5% at the second and third spans, which indicates that the integral stiffness of the bridge improves significantly. The calculated maximum crack width is 0.15 mm and smaller than 0.20 mm that is the allowable value in the Code for Design of Highway Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Bridges and Culverts(JTG D62—2004)(Bridge Code for short), and the checking results of bearing capacity, deflection and crack width meet the requirement of Bridge Code. The rows of supports have no significant effect on the inner forces of the superstructure, and the double row supports are feasible. The friction coefficient between the approach slab and its subgrade has significant influence on the axial forces of the approach slabs and the pavement, but has no significant effect on the bending moment. The maximum tensile stresses of the approach slab and pavement are 0.87 and 1.25 MPa, respectively, which meets the strength design requirement. 11 tabs, 17 figs, 30 refs.

References:


[1] ALA N, AZIZINAMINI A. Experimental study of seamless bridge transition system for U.S. practice[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016, 21(2): 04015046-1-13.
[2] SABER A, ROBERTS F, TOUPS J, et al. Effectiveness of continuity diaphragm for skewed continuous prestressed concrete girder bridges[J]. PCI Journal, 2007, 52(2): 108-114.
[3] ATTANAYAKEU B. Macromechanical modeling of precast orthotropic bridge superstructure systems[D]. Detroit: Wayne State University, 2006.
[4] FU C C, PAN Z F, AHMED M S. Transverse posttensioning design of adjacent precast solid multibeam bridges[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2011, 25(3): 223-230.
[5] THIPPESWAMY H K, GANGARAO H V S, FRANCO J M. Performance evaluation of jointless bridges[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2002, 7(5): 276-289.
[6] 胡大琳,王天利,陈 峰,等.半整体式桥台无伸缩缝桥静力分析[J].交通运输工程学报,2006,6(1):52-62. HU Da-lin, WANG Tian-li, CHEN Feng, et al. Static analysis of semi-integral abutment jointless bridge[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2006, 6(1): 52-62.(in Chinese)
[7] HOPPE E, WEAKLEY K, THOMPSON P. Jointless bridge design at the Virginia Department of Transportation[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2016, 14: 3943-3952.
[8] MARURI R F, PETRO S H. Integral abutments and jointless bridges(IAJB)2004 survey summary[R]. Baltimore: University of Maryland, 2004.
[9] HUSAIN I, BAGNARIOL D. Performance of integral abutment bridges[R]. Toronto: Ministry of Transportation Ontario, 2000.
[10] KAUFMANN W, ALVAREZ M. Swiss federal roads office guidelines for integral bridges[J]. Journal of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, 2011, 21(2): 189-194.
[11] KEROKOSKI O. Soil-structure interaction of long jointless bridges with integral abutments[D]. Tampere: Tampere University of Technology, 2006.
[12] WHITE H, PÉTURSSON H, COLLIN P. Integral abutment bridges: the European way[J]. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 2010, 15(3): 201-208.
[13] 洪锦祥,彭大文.桩基础的整体式桥台桥梁受力性能研究[J].中国公路学报,2002,15(4):43-48. HONG Jin-xiang, PENG Da-wen. Research on the loaded property of integral abutment bridges with flexible piles[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2002, 15(4): 43-48.(in Chinese)
[14] 彭大文,陈晓冬,袁 燕.整体式桥台桥梁台后土压力的季节性变化研究[J].岩土工程学报,2003,25(2):135-139. PENG Da-wen, CHEN Xiao-dong, YUAN Yan. Study on seasonal fluctuation of earth pressure behind the abutment[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(2): 135-139.(in Chinese)
[15] 金晓勤,邵旭东.半整体式全无缝桥梁研究[J].土木工程学报,2009,42(9):68-73. JIN Xiao-qin, SHAO Xu-dong. A study of full jointless bridge-approach system with semi-integral abutment[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2009, 42(9): 68-73.(in Chinese)
[16] 徐 明.整体式桥台后粗粒土填料力学特性的试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2010,43(5):136-141. XU Ming. Laboratory study of the behavior of granular soils behind integral bridge abutments[J].China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(5): 136-141.(in Chinese)
[17] 于天来,周 田,姜立东,等.升温作用下整体桥台台后土压力计算方法的探讨[J].桥梁建设,2010(1):29-31,35. YU Tian-lai, ZHOU Tian, JIANG Li-dong, et al. Study of calculating methods for earth pressure behind abutment of integral abutment bridge under action of rising temperatures[J]. Bridge Construction, 2010(1): 29-31, 35.(in Chinese)
[18] ALA N, AZIZINAMINI A. Proposed design provisions for a seamless bridge system: cases of flexible and jointed pavements[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016, 21(2): 04015045-1-13.
[19] JAYARAMAN R. Integral bridge concept applied to rehabilitate an existing bridge and construct a dual-use bridge[C]∥Singapore Concrete Institute. 26th Conference on Our World in Concrete and Structures. Singapore: CI-Premier, 2001: 341-348.
[20] ZORDAN T, BRISEGHELLA B. Attainment of an integral abutment bridge through the refurbishment of a simply supported structure[J]. Journal of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, 2007, 17(3): 228-234.
[21] 项贻强,张 翔,赵 荐,等.退役预应力混凝土梁受弯全过程分析及试验研究[J].桥梁建设,2015,45(5):30-35. XIANG Yi-qiang, ZHANG Xiang, ZHAO Jian, et al. Full-rang analysis and experimental study of flexural behavior of PC hollow slab girders out of service[J]. Bridge Construction, 2015, 45(5): 30-35.(in Chinese)
[22] 吴庆雄,陈悦驰,陈康明.结合面底部带门式钢筋的铰接空心板破坏模式分析[J].交通运输工程学报,2015,15(5):15-25. WU Qing-xiong, CHEN Yue-chi, CHEN Kang-ming. Failure mode analysis of hinged voided slab with gate-type steel rebars at bottom of junction surface[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2015, 15(5): 15-25.(in Chinese)
[23] 胡铁明,黄承逵,陈小锋,等.简支变连续法加固混凝土梁桥疲劳试验[J].中国公路学报,2010,23(5):76-82. HU Tie-ming, HUANG Cheng-kui, CHEN Xiao-feng, et al. Fatigue experiment of concrete bridges strengthened by simple-supporting to continuous construction method[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2010, 23(5): 76-82.(in Chinese)
[24] 陈小峰,胡铁明,黄承逵.钢纤维自应力混凝土加固梁抗弯疲劳性能试验研究[J].建筑结构,2009,39(4):65-68. CHEN Xiao-feng, HU Tie-ming, HUANG Cheng-kui. Experimental research on bend fatigue behavior of steel fiber reinforced self-stressing concrete beams[J]. Building Structure, 2009, 39(4): 65-68.(in Chinese)
[25] 靳欣华,姚启明,张澎涛.简支变连续梁法加固多跨T梁桥效应分析[J].重庆交通学院学报,2006,25(2):4-7. JIN Xin-hua, YAO Qi-ming, ZHANG Peng-tao. Reinforcing effect analysis of converting simply-support into continuous for multi-span T shape free beam bridge[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2006, 25(2): 4-7.(in Chinese)
[26] WANG Wen-wei, DAI Jian-guo, HUANG Cheng-kui, et al. Strengthening multiple span simply-supported girder bridges using post-tensioned negative moment connection technique[J]. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(2): 663-673.
[27] 马培培,陈 淮,陈代海,等.既有装配式空心板桥单板抗弯承载力退化分析[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2016,13(5):863-870. MA Pei-pei, CHEN Huai, CHEN Dai-hai, et al. On bearing capacity deterioration of in service prefabricated prestressed concrete hollow slab bridge[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2016, 13(5): 863-870.(in Chinese)
[28] 张 彬,朱 栋,徐建炜,等.浙江省中小跨径混凝土桥梁整体状况与典型病害研究[J].重庆交通大学学报:自然科学版,2013,32(增1):742-745,751. ZHANG Bin, ZHU Dong, XU Jian-wei, et al. Overall situation and typical diseases of medium and small span concrete bridges in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University: Natural Science, 2013, 32(S1): 742-745, 751.(in Chinese)
[29] 董桔灿,陈宝春,BRISEGHELLA B,等.多跨空心板简支梁桥整体化改造设计[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2015,32(5):73-80. DONG Ju-can, CHEN Bao-chun, BRISEGHELLA B, et al. Integral transformation design of multi-span hollow slab simply-supported bridge[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2015, 32(5): 73-80.(in Chinese)
[30] 唐玉风,薛俊青,张培权,等.无缝桥面板式引板滑移材料摩阻系数试验研究[C]∥陆新征.第26届全国结构工程学术会议论文集(第Ⅱ册).北京:工程力学杂志社,2017:514-519. TANG Yu-feng, XUE Jun-qing, ZHANG Pei-quan, et al. Experiment study on the friction coefficient of the sliding material of the plate-type approach slab for jointless bridges[C]∥LU Xin-zheng. Proceedings of the 26th National Conference on Structural Engineering(No.Ⅱ). Beijing: Journal of Engineering Mechanicals, 2017: 514-519.(in Chinese)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-05-30