|Table of Contents|

Mechanical responses of Boeing 747 running on runways(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2016年02期
Page:
1-9
Research Field:
道路与铁道工程
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Mechanical responses of Boeing 747 running on runways
Author(s):
WANG Xing-tao1;  CHEN Jian-feng1;  YE Guan-bao1;  YANG Dong1;  XUE Jian-feng2
1. School of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Geotechnical and HydrogeologicalEngineering Research Group(GHERG), Federation University Australia, Ballarat 3842, Victoria, Australia
Keywords:
airport engineering;  runway;  mechanical response;  strain;  deflection;  load-transferred coefficient
PACS:
V351.11
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Based on the large amounts of measured strains and deflections of runway pavement at Denver International Airport, the main characteristics of deflections and strains at different positions of pavement were analyzed when Boeing 747 was running on runway, and the load transfer capacities of different joints, the residual deformations and strain rates of pavement at the typical positions were researched. Analysis result shows that the edge and middle of slab have 2 strain peaks respectively, which corresponds with the number of aircraft’s main gear axles. The transverse strain(perpendicular to the running direction of aircraft)only has one type, while the longitudinal strain(parallel to the running direction of aircraft)shows 2 times’ transformation between tension and compression. The peak-strain recovery between gear axles at the bottom of longitudinal joint edge is significant, its peak strain and peak-strain recovery are 1.2 times and 2.5 times as much as the values at the top of longitudinal joint edge respectively, which means more prone to cracking and fatigue damage. When the aircraft is running, the maximum strain rates occur at the joint, and the maximum tensile and compressive strain rates are 9.1×10-4 s-1and 7.6×10-4 s-1 respectively, and belong to quasi-static strain rate, so their impact on the deformation of concrete slab are ignored. The deflection curves at the slab’s middle have 1 peak, but there are 2 peaks at the slab’s corner and transverse joint edge. The relative residual deformation at corner of slab is largest, the deformation at the middle of slab is least, the relative residual deformation rate at the corner of slab is 2.60-4.59 times as large as the value at the middle of slab, and compared with other locations, the corner more easily occurs void with base. The load-transferred coefficient of hinged joint is about 1, the load-transferred coefficient of dummy joint is lower compared with hinged joint, the load-transferred characteristic of dummy joint has directionality, but the load-transferred characteristic of hinged joint is non-directional. 3 tabs, 12 figs, 25 refs.

References:

[1] 翁兴中,寇雅楠,颜祥程.飞机滑行作用下水泥混凝土道面板动响应分析[J].振动与冲击,2012,31(14):79-84.WENG Xing-zhong, KOU Ya-nan, YAN Xiang-cheng. Dynamic response of cement concrete pavement under aircraft taxiing load[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(14):79-84.(in Chinese)
[2] 黄晓明,邓学钧.移动荷载作用下粘弹性文克勒地基板的力学分析[J]. 重庆交通学院学报,1990,9(2):45-51.HUANG Xiao-ming, DENG Xue-jun. The mechanical analysis of plate on visco-elastic Winkler foundation under moving load[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong Institute,1990, 9(2): 45-51.(in Chinese)
[3] 孙 璐,邓学钧.运动分布荷载作用下弹性地基上无限大板瞬态响应[J]. 应用力学学报,1997,14(2):72-78.SUN Lu, DENG Xue-jun. Transient response for infinite plate on Winkler foundation by a moving distributed load[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1997, 14(2): 72-78.(in Chinese)
[4] 孙 璐,邓学钧.运动负荷下粘弹性Kelvin 地基上无限大板的稳态响应[J].岩土工程学报,1997,19(2):14-22.SUN Lu, DENG Xue-jun. Steady response of infinite plate on viscoelastic Kelvin foundation to moving load[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1997, 19(2): 14-22.(in Chinese)
[5] 蒋建群,周华飞,张土乔.移动荷载下粘弹性地基上无限大板的稳态响应[J].中国公路学报,2006,19(1):6-11.JIANG Jian-qun, ZHOU Hua-fei, ZHANG Tu-qiao. Steady state response of infinite plate on visco-elastic foundation subjected to moving load [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2006, 19(1): 6-11.(in Chinese)
[6] 郑 飞,翁兴中.飞机荷载作用下水泥混凝土道面板应力计算方法[J].交通运输工程学报,2010,10(4):8-15.ZHENG Fei, WENG Xing-zhong. Calculating methods of stress for cement concrete pavement slab under plane loads[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2010, 10(4): 8-15.(in Chinese)
[7] 周正峰,凌建明,袁 捷.机场水泥混凝土道面接缝传荷能力分析[J].土木工程学报,2009,42(2):112-118.ZHOU Zheng-feng, LING Jian-ming, YUAN Jie. 3-D finite element analysis of the load transfer efficiency of joints of airport rigid pavement[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2009, 42(2): 112-118.(in Chinese)
[8] BRILL D R, PARSONS I D. Three-dimensional finite element analysis in airport pavement design[J]. The International Journal of Geomechanics, 2001, 1(3): 273-290.
[9] SUN Lu, ZHANG Zhan-ming, RUTH J. Modeling indirect statistics of surface roughness[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2001, 127(2): 105-111.
[10] KIM S, WON M, MCCULLOUGH B F. Airport pavement response under moving dynamic aircraft loads[C]∥SPROULE W, JANSEN S. Designing, Constructing, Maintaining, and Financing Today’s Airport Projects. Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2002: 1-10.
[11] KIM J, HJELMSTAD K D. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of doweled joints for airport pavements[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2003(1853): 100-109.
[12] 凌建明,刘 文,赵鸿铎.大型军用飞机多轮荷载作用下水泥混凝土道面的结构响应[J].土木工程学报,2007,40(4):60-65.LING Jian-ming, LIU Wen, ZHAO Hong-duo. Mechanical responses of rigid airport pavement to multiple-gear military aircraft loadings[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2007, 40(4): 60-65.(in Chinese)
[13] 周正峰,凌建明.基于ABAQUS的机场刚性道面结构有限元模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2009,9(3):39-44.ZHOU Zheng-feng, LING Jian-ming. Finite element model of rigid airport pavement structure baseed on ABAQUS[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2009, 9(3): 39-44.(in Chinese)
[14] SAWANT V. Dynamic analysis of rigid pavement with vehicle-pavement interaction[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2009, 10(1): 63-72.
[15] 娄 平,曾庆元.移动荷载作用下板式轨道的有限元分析[J].交通运输工程学报,2004,4(1):29-33.LOU Ping, ZENG Qing-yuan. Finite element analysis of slab track subjected to moving load[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2004, 4(1): 29-33.(in Chinese)
[16] PATIL V A, SAWANT V A, DEB K. 3D finite-element dynamic analysis of rigid pavement using infinite elements[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2013, 13(5): 533-544.
[17] PATIL V A, SAWANT V A, DEB K. 2-D finite element analysis of rigid pavement considering dynamic vehicle-pavement interaction effects[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(3): 1282-1294.
[18] ZOKAEI-ASHTIANI A, TIRADO C, CARRASCO C, et al. Impact of different approaches to modelling rigid pavement base layers on slab curling stresses[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2015, DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2015.1019505.
[19] VAJARASATHIRA K, YENER M, TING E C. Aircraft-pavement interaction in runway analysis[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1984, 110(5): 1008-1020.
[20] TAHERI M R, ZAMAN M M, ALVAPPILLAI A. Dynamic response of concrete pavements to moving aircraft[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 1990, 14(11): 562-575.
[21] RIAD M Y, SHOUKRY S N, WILLIAM G W, et al. Effect of skewed joints on the performance of jointed concrete pavement through 3D dynamic finite element analysis[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2009, 10(4): 251-263.
[22] LEDBETTER R H. Pavement response to aircraft dynamic loads. Volume Ⅲ[R]. Vicksburg: Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, 1975.
[23] 杨 斐,杨宇亮,孙立军.飞机起降荷载作用下的场道地基沉降[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,2008,36(6):744-748.YANG Fei, YANG Yu-liang, SUN Li-jun.Settlement of runway subgrade under moving aircraft loads[J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 2008, 36(6): 744-748.(in Chinese)
[24] FANG Ying-wu. Analysis of load responses in PCC airport pavement[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2000, 1(1): 1-14.
[25] BRILL D R. Field verification of a 3D finite element rigid airport pavement model[R]. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Administration, US Department of Transportation, 2000.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-04-20