|Table of Contents|

Kinetic energy uphill performance of heavy-haul train based on multi-particle model(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2015年05期
Page:
50-56
Research Field:
载运工具运用工程
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Kinetic energy uphill performance of heavy-haul train based on multi-particle model
Author(s):
WANG Kai-yun;  HUANG Chao
State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China
Keywords:
train longitudinal dynamics;  multi-particle model;  single particle model;  uphill performance;  tractive tonnage
PACS:
U260.131
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Train multi-particle longitudinal dynamics model was used to analyze the influences of train initial speed, train marshalling, slope length and slope gradient on the kinetic energy uphill performance of train. A comparison between multi-particle model and single particle model was made. A specific example was given to illustrate the difference of the maximum tractive tonnages between the two models in the kinetic energy uphill. Analysis result indicates that the higher the uphill initial speed is, the better the uphill performance is. The uphill performance declines with the increases of train marshalling, slope length and slope gradient. The difference of train uphill lowest speed of two models increases with the decrease of train uphill initial speed. The difference of the uphill lowest speeds of two models is 5.29 km·h-1 when the initial speed is 60 km·h-1. The calculation result of single particle model is more and more conservative with the increases of train marshalling, slope length and slope gradient. Train maximum tractive tonnages are 8 250 t and 8 750 t based on single particle model and multi-particle model respectively, in which the latter is 6.1% higher than the former. It is suggested that the multi-particle longitudinal dynamics model can be adopted to calculate train maximum tractive tonnage in kinetic energy uphill. 3 tabs, 14 figs, 20 refs.

References:

[1] 张 波.襄渝线HXD1型电力机车牵引性能仿真及试验研究[J].中国铁道科学,2012,33(5):68-75.ZHANG Bo. Simulation and test study on the traction performance of HXD1 electric locomotive on Xiang-Yu Line[J]. China Railway Science, 2012, 33(5): 68-75.(in Chinese)
[2] 闫永平,吴宜诚.重载列车途停原因分析及对策[J].铁道机车车辆,2010,30(4):83-86.YAN Yong-ping, WU Yi-cheng. Analysis on heavy haul train in-section halt and its countermeasures[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2010, 30(4): 83-86.(in Chinese)
[3] 董雪婷,黄 超.大功率交流传动电力机车牵引特性分析[J].兰州交通大学学报,2010,29(1):90-94.DONG Xue-ting, HUANG Chao. Analysis of tractive characteristics of high-power AC transmission electric locomotives[J]. Journal of Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2010, 29(1): 90-94.(in Chinese)
[4] HOWLETT P. Optimal strategies for the control of a train[J]. Automatica, 1996, 32(4): 519-532.
[5] LIU R, GOLOVITCHER I M. Enery-efficient operation of rail vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2003, 37(10): 917-932.
[6] 李广峰.基于牵引计算的机车优化操纵方案研究与应用[J].铁道机车车辆,2008,28(5):48-50.LI Guang-feng. Research and application of locomotive optimization operation project based on the traction calculation[J]. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2008, 28(5): 48-50.(in Chinese)
[7] 石红国.线路纵断面化简对列车牵引质量的影响分析[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2013,11(4):45-48.SHI Hong-guo. Influence of railway longitudinal section simplification on train traction load capacity[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2013, 11(4): 45-48.(in Chinese)
[8] GEIKE T. Understanding high coupler forces at metro vehicles[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2007, 45(4): 389-396.
[9] COLE C, SUN Y Q. Simulated comparisons of wagon coupler systems in heavy haul trains[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2006, 220(3): 247-256.
[10] 马卫华,宋荣荣,揭长安,等.缓冲器阻抗特性对重载列车动力学性能的影响[J].交通运输工程学报,2011,11(2):59-64.MA Wei-hua, SONG Rong-rong, JIE Chang-an, et al. Influences of buffer impedance characteristics on dynamics performances for heavy haul train[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11(2): 59-64.(in Chinese)
[11] PIECHOWIAK T. Verification of pneumatic railway brake models[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2010, 48(3): 283-299.
[12] 魏 伟.列车空气制动系统仿真的有效性[J].中国铁道科学,2006,27(5):104-109.WEI Wei. The validity of the simulation for train air brake system[J]. China Railway Science, 2006, 27(5): 104-109.(in Chinese)
[13] ANSARI M, ESMAILZADEH E, YOUNESIAN D. Longitudinal dynamics of freight trains[J]. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems, 2009, 16(1/2): 102-131.
[14] NASR A, MOHAMMADI S. The effects of train brake delay time on in-train forces[J]. Proceedings of the Institution ofMechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2010, 224(6): 523-534.
[15] 石红国,彭其渊,郭寒英.城市轨道交通牵引计算模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2005,5(4):20-26.SHI Hong-guo, PENG Qi-yuan, GUO Han-ying. Traction calculation model of urban mass transit[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2005, 5(4): 20-26.(in Chinese)
[16] ZHUAN X, XIA X. Cruise control scheduling of heavy haul trains[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2006, 14(4): 757-766.
[17] CHOU M, XIA X, KAYSER C. Modelling and model validation of heavy-haul trains equipped with electronically controlled pneumatic brake systems[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2007, 15(4): 501-509.
[18] ZHAI Wan-ming. Two simple fast integration methods for large-scale dynamic problems in engineering[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1996, 39(24): 4199-4214.
[19] 黄运华,李 芾,傅茂海,等.缓冲器特性曲线间断点算法比较[J].西南交通大学学报,2005,40(1):9-12.HUANG Yun-hua, LI Fu, FU Mao-hai, et al. Comparison of algorithms for discontinuity on the characteristics curves of draft gears[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2005, 40(1): 9-12.(in Chinese)
[20] WANG Kai-yun, HUANG Chao, ZHAI Wan-ming, et al. Progress on wheel-rail dynamic performance of railway curve negotiation[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering: English Edition, 2014, 1(3): 209-220.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2015-10-20