|Table of Contents|

Design method of LSCR based on mortar theory(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2015年05期
Page:
8-14,33
Research Field:
道路与铁道工程
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Design method of LSCR based on mortar theory
Author(s):
JIANG Ying-jun1 FU Zhi-peng2 LI Ning-fang1
1. Key Laboratory for Special Area Highway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, Shaanxi, China; 2. CCCC First Highway Consultants Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710075, Shaanxi, China
Keywords:
road engineering mortar theory LSCR design method mechanical strength
PACS:
U416.2
DOI:
-
Abstract:
In order to improve the mechanical strength of lime-fly-ash-stabilized crushed rock(LSCR), LSCR was regard as a dispersed system with 3-level spatial reticular structures, including lime-fly-ash mortar(LAM)micro dispersed system, lime-fly-ash fine aggregate mortar(LFAM)fine dispersed system, and LSCR coarse dispersed system. Based on the principle of optimal compressive strength, the mass ratio of LAM and LFAM was computed by using vertical vibration test method(VVTM). Based on the principle of optimal density, the gradation of coarse aggregate was confirmed by using step-by-step filling method. Based on the principle of optimal compressive strength, the optimal amount of LFAM in the LSCR was determined. The design method of LSCR was proposed based on mortar theory, and its performance was verified by using indoor experiment and field experiment. Verification result indicates that the mechanical properties and shrinkage properties of LAM are optimal when the mass ratio of lime to fly-ash is 2:5. When the decreasing coefficient of quality passing rate of fine aggregate is 0.65, the mass ratio of lime-fly-ash to fine aggregate is 3:2, the mechanical strength of LFAM is maximum. When the mass ratio of aggregates with particle size range of 19-37.5, 9.5-19, 4.75-9.5 mm is 17:11:6, the density of mixing coarse aggregate is maximum. Compared with the mechanical strength of LSCR specimen designed by traditional method, the early stage(7 d)mechanical strength of LSCR specimen designed by mortar theory increases by more than 10%, and the late stage(180 d)mechanical strength increases by more than 20%. The average ratio of compressive strength of VVTM specimen to specimen of site is 0.909, and the average ratio of splitting strength is 0.904. The average ratio of compressive strength of static pressure compaction specimen to specimen of site is 0.457, and the average ratio of splitting strength is 0.531. The LSCR designed by VVTM is more scientific than static pressure method. 10 tabs, 8 figs, 20 refs.

References:

[1] BARENBERG E J, THOMPSON M R. Design, construction, and performance of lime, fly ash, and slag pavement[C]∥TRB. 61st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington DC: TRB, 1982: 1-6.
[2] SHARPE G W, DEEN R C, SOUTHGATE H F, et al. Pavement thickness designs using low-strength(Pozzolanic)base and subbase materials[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1985(1043): 122-130.
[3] 李振霞,陈渊召.不同类型半刚性基层材料性能的试验与分析[J].长安大学学报:自然科学版,2012,32(1):41-46.LI Zhen-xia, CHEN Yuan-zhao. Test and analysis of properties for different types of semi-rigid base materials[J]. Jounral of Chang’an University: Natural Science Edition, 2012, 32(1): 41-46.(in Chinese)
[4] JTJ034—2000,公路路面基层施工技术规范[S].JTJ034—2000, technical specifications for construction of highway roadbases[S].(in Chinese)
[5] 滕旭秋.二灰碎石混合料配合比设计及路用性能研究[D].西安:长安大学,2003.TENG Xu-qiu. Mixture design and pavement performance of lime-fly ash stabilized aggregates[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2003.(in Chinese)
[6] 刘红瑛,戴经梁.骨架密实二灰稳定碎石混合料配合比设计方法[J].长安大学学报:自然科学版,2003,23(2):11-16.LIU Hong-ying, DAI Jing-liang. Design method of mixture skeleton densed with lime-flyash and crushed rock[J]. Journal of Chang’an University: Natural Science Edition, 2003, 23(2): 11-16.(in Chinese)
[7] 刘红瑛,牛长友,王 强,等.骨架密实型二灰稳定碎石基层路用性能[J].长安大学学报:自然科学版,2003,23(3):37-42.LIU Hong-ying, NIU Chang-you, WANG Qiang, et al. Pavement performance of lime flyash stabilized aggregate base with skeleton dense structure[J]. Journal of Chang’an University: Natural Science Edition, 2003, 23(3): 37-42.(in Chinese)
[8] 蒋应军.多级嵌挤骨架密实二灰碎石组成设计方法研究[J].重庆交通大学学报:自然科学版,2010,29(5):732-736.JIANG Ying-jun. Mix design method for lime-fly-ash-stabilized aggregate of multilevel dense built-in grading structure[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University: Natural Science, 2010, 29(5): 732-736.(in Chinese)
[9] 姜爱锋,任惠清.二灰碎石组成配合比设计[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,1999,27(3):309-313.JIANG Ai-feng, REN Hui-qing. Mixture design of lime-flyash stabilized aggregate[J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 1999, 27(3): 309-313.(in Chinese)
[10] 滕旭秋,陈忠达.二灰砂浆配合比设计方法[J].长安大学学报:自然科学版,2005,25(3):37-40.TENG Xu-qiu, CHEN Zhong-da. Mixture design method for lime-fly ash mortar[J]. Journal of Chang’an University: Natural Science Edition, 2005, 25(3): 37-40.(in Chinese)
[11] 车 法,陈拴发,朱金凤,等.骨架密实型二灰稳定碎石配合比设计方法研究[J].河北工业大学学报,2010,39(2):96-99.CHE Fa, CHEN Shuan-fa, ZHU Jin-feng, et al. Research on mixture component design of “skeleton-closed” lime-fly ash stabilized aggregate[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Technology, 2010, 39(2): 96-99.(in Chinese)
[12] 师晖军.高性能二灰稳定碎石混合料设计和路用性能研究[J].筑路机械与施工机械化,2014,31(8):69-72.SHI Hui-jun. Research on mixture design and pavement performance of high performance lime fly-ash stabilized aggregate[J]. Road Machinery and Construction Mechanization, 2014, 31(8): 69-72.(in Chinese)
[13] 陈 磊,滕桃居,石 祥.纤维增强二灰稳定碎石基层干缩性能的试验研究[J].交通标准化,2013(24):63-65.CHEN Lei, TENG Tao-ju, SHI Xiang. Experimental study on fiber reinforcing dry shrinkage performance of two ash stabilization macadam base[J]. Transportation Standardization, 2013(24): 63-65.(in Chinese)
[14] 马士宾,刘俊琴,郭建宁,等.骨架密实型二灰碎石基层的收缩性能[J].重庆交通大学学报:自然科学版,2013,32(2):215-219.MA Shi-bin, LIU Jun-qin, GUO Jian-ning, et al. Research on shrinkage performance of dense skeleton based on lime fly-ash stabilized aggregate[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University: Natural Science, 2013, 32(2): 215-219.(in Chinese)
[15] 魏连雨,王 涛,马士宾.非标准养生温度下二灰稳定碎石路用性能试验研究[J].公路,2012(1):34-38.WEI Lian-yu, WANG Tao, MA Shi-bin. Test and study on road performance of lime-flyash stabilized aggregates under non-standard curing temperature[J]. Highway, 2012(1): 34-38.(in Chinese)
[16] DB 61/T 529—2011,垂直振动法水泥稳定碎石设计施工技术规范[S].DB 61/T 529—2011, specifications for design and construction of cement stabilized macadam base VVTM[S].(in Chinese)
[17] 李明杰,蒋应军,张俊杰,等.半刚性基层材料振动试验方法[J].交通运输工程学报,2010,10(1):7-12.LI Ming-jie, JIANG Ying-jun, ZHANG Jun-jie, et al. Vibration test method of semi-rigid base course material[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2010, 10(1): 7-12.(in Chinese)
[18] JIANG Y J, FAN L F. An investigation of mechanical behavior of cement-stabilized crushed rock material using different compaction methods[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 48(11): 508-515.
[19] JIANG Ying-jun, WONG L N Y, REN Jiao-long. A numerical test method of California bearing ratio on graded crushed rocks using particle flow modeling[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering: English Edition, 2015, 2(2): 107-115.
[20] 田 波,权 磊,牛开民.不同基层类型水泥混凝土路面温度翘曲结构试验与理论分析[J].中国公路学报,2014,27(6):17-26.TIAN Bo, QUAN Lei, NIU Kai-min. Structural experiment and theoretical analysis of thermal curling in JPCP with different base types[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2014, 27(6): 17-26.(in Chinese)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2015-10-20