|Table of Contents|

Dynamic responses of motor vehicle in low-speed derailment(PDF)

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:
2015年04期
Page:
52-60,68
Research Field:
载运工具运用工程
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Dynamic responses of motor vehicle in low-speed derailment
Author(s):
GUO Li-rong1 WANG Kai-yun1 WANG Hui-qiong2 ZHANG Bing1 LIN Jian-hui1
1. State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China; 2. Department of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Pingxiang University, Pingxiang 337055, Jiangxi, China
Keywords:
motor vehicle derailment experiment post-derailment safety device dynamic responses ballastless track
PACS:
U270.11
DOI:
-
Abstract:
The low-speed derailment experiment of signal motor vehicle with post-derailment safety device under axle box was carried out. The derailer was installed on the rail to force the vehicle to derail. Acceleration sensors, displacement sensors and strain gauges were used to detect the dynamic responses of derailed vehicle. The motion attitude of derailed vehicle was recorded by using high-speed cameras and surveillance cameras. According to the test data, the ability of overturning resistance for rail and the performance of derailment safety device were verified. The dynamic responses of derailed vehicle and the effects of derailment speed, vehicle mass and track on the responses were studied. Test result indicates that in low-speed derailment, the biggest lateral force between rail and post-derailment safety device is 177.18 kN that is less than the lateral resistance of 510.00 kN, so the post-derailment safety device has the ability to limit the lateral displacement of derailed vehicle by catching the outside of rail after derailment. The derailment process is divided into four stages, including idling, running on the derailer, falling and coasting on the track, at which the dynamic responses of derailed vehicle are increasing with the increase of derailment speed and vehicle mass. When derailment speed is 22 km·h-1, the derailment distance of CRTSⅡ bi-block sleepers ballastless track is about 15.80 m, while that of CRTSⅠ slab ballastless track is about 20.87 m. Accordingly, the bi-block sleepers of CRTSⅡ bi-block sleepers ballastless track resemble the speed bump and decrease the derailment distance. 4 tabs, 13 figs, 25 refs.

References:

[1] 向 俊,周智辉,曾庆元.列车脱轨研究最新进展[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2005,2(5):1-8.XIANG Jun, ZHOU Zhi-hui, ZENG Qing-yuan. Recent developments in train derailment research[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2005, 2(5): 1-8.(in Chinese)
[2] 王开云,王少林,杨久川,等.地震环境下铁路轮轨动态安全性能及脱轨研究进展[J].地震工程与工程振动,2012,32(6):82-94.WANG Kai-yun, WANG Shao-lin, YANG Jiu-chuan, et al. Progress in study on wheel/rail dynamic safety and derailment of railway during an earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2012, 32(6): 82-94.(in Chinese)
[3] 阳建鸣,刘春雨.日本上越新干线列车脱轨事故探究[J].中国铁路,2006(8):42-45.YANG Jian-ming, LIU Chun-yu. Research on derail accident on Jyoetsu-Shinkansen[J]. Chinese Railways, 2006(8): 42-45.(in Chinese)
[4] 金学松,郭 俊,肖新标,等.高速列车安全运行研究的关键科学问题[J].工程力学,2009,26(增II):8-22,105.JIN Xue-song, GUO Jun, XIAO Xin-biao, et al. Key scientific problems in the study on running safety of high speed trains[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(SII): 8-22, 105.(in Chinese)
[5] 周诗广,郑 健.日本高速铁路的地震对策[J].铁道工程学报,2008(增2):35-43.ZHOU Shi-guang, ZHENG Jian. Earthquake countermeasures of Japan’s high-speed railway[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2008(S2): 35-43.(in Chinese)
[6] 肖新标.复杂环境状态下高速列车脱轨机理研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2013.XIAO Xin-biao. Study on high-speed train derailment mechanism in severe environment[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013.(in Chinese)
[7] BRABIE D, ANDERSSON E. Dynamic simulation of derailments and its consequences[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2006, 44(S1): 652-662.
[8] BRABIE D, ANDERSSON E. Post-derailment dynamic simulation of rail vehicles-methodology and applications[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2008, 46(S1): 289-300.
[9] BRABIE D, ANDERSSON E. An overview of some high-speed train derailments: means of minimizing consequences based on empirical observations[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2008, 222(4): 441-463.
[10] BRABIE D, ANDERSSON E. On minimizing derailment risks and consequences for passenger trains at higher speeds[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2009, 223(6): 543-566.
[11] KAJITANI Y, KATO H, ASANO K. Development of a L-shaped guide to prevent deviation from rails[J]. JR East Technical Review, 2010(15): 53-56.
[12] NISHIMURA, K, TERUMICHI Y, MORIMURA T, et al. Development of vehicle dynamics simulation for safety analyses of rail vehicles on excited tracks[J]. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, 2009, 4(1): 1-9.
[13] SUNAMI H, MORIMURA T, TERUMICHI Y, et al. Model for analysis of bogie frame motion under derailment conditions based on full-scale running tests [J]. Multibody System Dynamics, 2012, 27(3): 321-349.
[14] 杨春雷,翟婉明.车辆动力学仿真中评判脱轨的直接方法[J].交通运输工程学报,2002,2(3):23-26.YANG Chun-lei, ZHAI Wan-ming. Directmethod for evaluation of wheel derailment in simulation of railway vehicle dynamics[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2002, 2(3): 23-26.(in Chinese)
[15] WANG Wei, DING Jie-xiong. Research on dynamical derailment system for CRH[J]. Engineering Sciences, 2011, 9(4): 51-54.
[16] 楚永萍,韩玉忠,宫相太,等.铁路客车防溜逸颠覆导向挡板研究[J].中国铁道科学,2012,33(增1):127-131.CHU Yong-ping, HAN Yu-zhong, GONG Xiang-tai, et al. Research on the guide baffle against runaway and subversion of railway passenger car[J]. China Railway Science, 2012,33(Sl): 127-131.(in Chinese)
[17] WU Xing-wen, CHI Mao-ru, GAO Hao, et al. Post-derailment dynamic behavior of railway vehicles travelling on a railway bridge during an earthquake[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2014, DOI: 10.1177/0954409714543338.
[18] WU Xing-wen, CHI Mao-ru, GAO Hao. The study of post-derailment dynamic behavior of railway vehicle based on running tests[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2014, 44: 382-399.
[19] WU Xing-wen, CHI Mao-ru, GAO Hao, et al. The study of post-derailment measures to limit the extent of a derailment[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F:Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2014, DOI: 10.1177/0954409714526586.
[20] 王 伟.高速车辆脱轨非线性动力学及其动态仿真[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2009.WANG Wei. Dynamical simulation of highspeed vehicle derailment and its nonlinear dynamical[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009.(in Chinese)
[21] 向 俊,曾庆元.列车-轨道(桥梁)时变系统横向振动稳定性与失稳临界车速分析方法[J].交通运输工程学报,2011,11(1):19-24.XIANG Jun, ZENG Qing-yuan. Analysis method of stability and critical speed for train-track(bridge)time-variable system under lateral vibration condition[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011, 11(1): 19-24.(in Chinese)
[22] 于春华.铁路钢轨扣件发展综述[J].铁道标准设计,2006(增):188-191.YU Chun-hua. Summary for development of railway steel track fastenings[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2006(S): 188-191.(in Chinese)
[23] 辛学忠,吴克俭.铁路客运专线无碴轨道扣件探讨[J].铁道工程学报,2006(2):1-4.XIN Xue-zhong, WU Ke-jian. Exploration on rail fastenings for ballastless track of passenger dedicated railway line[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2006(2): 1-4.(in Chinese)
[24] 伍 曾,李洁青,黄 伟,等.WJ-7型无砟轨道扣件扣压力损失的室温蠕变试验研究[J].铁道标准设计,2014,58(8):60-63.WU Zeng, LI Jie-qing, HUANG Wei, et al. Experiment research on room temperature creep affecting clamping force loss of WJ-7 type ballastless track fastener[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2014, 58(8): 60-63.(in Chinese)
[25] WANG Kai-yun, HUANG Chao, ZHAI Wan-ming, et al. Progress on wheel-rail dynamic performance of railway curve negotiation[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering: English Edition, 2014, 1(3): 209-220.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2015-08-30