«Previous Article|Table of Contents|Next Article»

《交通运输工程学报》[ISSN:1671-1637/CN:61-1369/U]

Issue:

2013年03期

Page:

71-78

Research Field:

交通运输规划与管理

Publishing date:

Info

Title:

Predictive logit model of trip mode with fuzzy attribute variables

Author(s):

ZHU Shun-ying¹;  DENG Shuang¹;  WANG Hong¹;  GUAN Ju-xiang²;  CHENG Yang³

1. School of Transportation, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China; 2. Shenzhen New Urban Planning and Architectural Design Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518172, Guangdong, China; 3. School of Engineering, University of Wiscosin, Madison 53706, Wiscosin, USA

Keywords:

traffic planning;  resident trip;  trip mode;  logit model;  fuzzy attribute variable;  triangle center

PACS:

U491.1

DOI:

-

Abstract:

Based on the disaggregate model and fuzzy mathematics theory, the trip behaviors of residents in urban agglomeration were taken as study subject, the trip time and the trip cost were taken as influence factors, and the parameters were calibrated by the maximum likelihood estimation method. Through t test, hit rate test and fit goodness test, the trip time was fuzzed, the influence of trip cost was ignored, and a predicative logit model of trip mode with fuzzy attribute variables was established. The fuzzy parameters of trip times for rail transit and car were chosen as 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 respectively, the influences of trip mode and trip time on trip behavior for residents were analyzed. Analysis result shows that the average trip perception time ratio of rail transit and car is between 0.8 and 1.2, and the two trip perception times change in equal degree. When the fuzzy parameter of trip time for rail transit is 0.1 and the trip time of car is less than 70 min, all the residents will choose rail transit. When the fuzzy parameter of trip time for rail transit is 0.3 and the trip time of car is less than 67 min, residents still choose rail transit, but when the trip time of car is more than 67 min and the fuzzy parameter of trip time for car is 0.1 and 0.3 respectively, residents will choose car. When the fuzzy parameter of trip time for rail transit is 0.5 and the trip time of car is less than 58 min, residents still choose rail transit, while the trip time of car is more than 66 min, all the residents choose car. 3 tabs, 4 figs, 27 refs.

References:

[1] MURTHY A S N, ASHTAKALA B. Modal split analysis using logit models[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1987, 113(5): 502-519.
[2] 刘 彤,巩丽媛,郑 建,等.Logit模型的推导方法研究[J].科学技术与工程,2009,9(2):357-359. LIU Tong, GONG Li-yuan, ZHENG Jian, et al. Study on deviation of logit model[J]. Science Technology and Engin-eering, 2009, 9(2): 357-359.(in Chinese)
[3] 李 辰.交通方式划分的Logit模型方法[D].南京:河海大学,2004. LI Chen. Method of logit model in traffic model-split[D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2004.(in Chinese)
[4] MCFADDEN D, TRAIN K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2000, 15(5): 447-470.
[5] BOYD J H, MELLMAN R E. The effect of fuel economy standards on the U.S. automotive market: an hedonic demand analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 1980, 14(5/6): 367-378.
[6] CARDELL N S, DUNBAR F C. Measuring the societal impacts of automobile down-sizing[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 1980, 14(5/6): 423-434.
[7] TRAIN K, MCFADDEN D, BEN-AKIVA M. The demand for local telephone service: a fully discrete model of residential calling patterns and service choice[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1987, 18(1): 109-123.
[8] BEN-AKIVA M, BOLDUC D, BRADLEY M. Estimation of travel choice models with randomly distributed values of time[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1993(1413): 88-97.
[9] BHAT C R. Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service measures in travel mode choice models[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 1998, 32(7): 495-507.
[10] BROWNSTONE D, TRAIN K. Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1999, 89(1/2): 109-129.
[11] ERDEM T. A dynamic analysis of market structure based on panel data[J]. Marketing Science, 1996, 15(4): 359-378.
[12] REVELT D, TRAIN K. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1998, 80(4): 647-657.
[13] BHAT C R. Incorporating observed and unobserved heterogeneity in urban work mode choice modeling[J]. Transportation Science, 2000, 34(2): 228-238.
[14] CHESHER A, SANTOSSILVA J M C. Taste variation in discrete choice models[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2002, 69(1): 147-168.
[15] ANDREWS R L, AINSLIE A, CURRIM I S. An empirical comparison of logit choice models with discrete versus continuous representation of heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2002, 39(4): 479-487.
[16] WILLIAMS H C W L. On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1977, 9(3): 285-344.
[17] 杨励雅,邵春福,HAGHANI A.出行方式与出发时间联合选择的分层Logit模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2012,12(2):76-83. YANG Li-ya, SHAO Chun-fu, HAGHANI A. Nested logit model of combined selection for travel mode and departure time[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012, 12(2): 76-83.(in Chinese)
[18] BOX G E P, COX D R. An analysis of transformations[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1964, 26(2): 211-252.
[19] GAUNDRY M J I, DAGENAIS M G. The dogit model[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1979, 13(2): 105-111.
[20] GERKEN J. Generalized logit model [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1991, 25(2): 75-88.
[21] VOVSHA P. Application of cross-nested logit model to mode choice in Tel Aviv, Israel, metropolitan area[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1997(1607): 6-15.
[22] KOPPELMAN F S, WEN C H. The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2000, 34(2): 75-89.
[23] SWAIT J, ADAMOWICZ W. The effect of choice environment and task demands on consumer behavior: discriminating between contribution and confusion[R]. Edmonton: University of Alberta, 1996.
[24] BHAT C R. Covariance heterogeneity in nested logit models: econometric structure and application to intercity travel[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1997, 31(1): 11-21.
[25] WEN C H, KOPPELMAN F S. The generalized nested logit model[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2001, 35(7): 627-641.
[26] 罗丽君,裴玉龙.模糊随机动态交通分配模型研究[J].华中科技大学学报:城市科学版,2002,19(2):64-67. LUO Li-jun, PEI Yu-long. Study on fuzzy random dynamic traffic assignment model[J].Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology: Urban Science Edition, 2002, 19(2): 64-67.(in Chinese)
[27] LIU H X, BAN Xue-gang, RAN Bin, et al. A formulation and solution algorithm for a fuzzy dynamic traffic assignment model[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2003(1854): 114-123.

Memo

Memo:

-

Common functions

Last Update: 2013-07-30